Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • comfortable with Charter
  • Problem statement: Agenda driven by LFN staff - not members
  • lack of continuity since launch in 2018
  • recordings & minutes being public impacts discussions
  • Surveys have been mix and match and the targets have been unclear/misleading
  • Topics have not had an impact on features of LFN projects
  • Mission Statement for EUAG 2.0 draft:
    • focus on most relevant topics within the LFN
    • Collecting the requirements from the SPs (Modeling, Testing , etc.)
    • Share expectations and experiences of activities (POCs, MVPs, RFPs)
    • Set the agenda for the industry for fully automateable capable and adaptable solutions
    • Align on requirements and support to LFN subcommittees
      • Time to market
      • Revenue
      • Performance, usability, reliability...
      • Compliance, Auditing, Security...
  • Way forward 2019/2020
    • Kick off the EUAG 2.0 (possibly) at the DDF in Stockholm June 2019
    • Establish an operating mode that can influence/support the PTLs/subcommittee
    • Bi-weekly calls with rotating moderation by members
    • Action item tracking
    • Reviews quarterly on DDF/OSN meetings - focus points/progress
    • Report to the LFN GB/TAC/TSCs


Review the homework

 Atul Purohit Focus areas

...

Vodafone

  • Carrier priorities ONAP
    • Functional/nonfumctinal (liaison w/ usecase sub committee) deployment related
  • State of Play
    • Production examples
    • PoC examples
  • Cross Carrier initiatives
    • Ex-BBS
    • EX - CCVPN
    • Use case focus? Not only use cases - feel free to use other examples
  • Distribution Strategy

...