...
- ONAP Consumption model white paper draft Atul Purohit
- based on input from service providers - articulate different consumption models from a governance perspective
- asking for EUAG collaboration on the white paper - will distribute via email
- EUAG CSP priorities for ONAP
- Based on EUAG member feedback
- Will distribute via email
- EUAG advisory to the GB - how does the advisory process work?
- EUAG decides to inform the board
- Jim Baker get the topic on the GB agenda
- Typically the GB gets a technical update - specific topics are addressed as driven by EUAG
- CNTT has 15 service providers engaged in the process
- Would like to get review/validation of the process
- Understand how CNTT interacts with other LFN initiative
- Dev teams interact with the EUAG to get feedback on the quality/docs/etc.
- Perhaps routine check ins with the other LFN projects
- let EUAG give direct feedback to the projects
- What help could the EUAG provide to the CNTT effort? Rabi Abdel
- Discuss CNTT roadmap and adoption strategy
- Marketing/messaging of the CNTT vision - use EUAG to vet the discussion points to align messaging to vendors
- Should we allocate a 30 minute block to CNTT topics?
- ?Why is ONAP the orchestrator referenced in the CNTT work? Saad Ullah Sheikh
- OSM+ (direct implementation of ETSI MANO) and ONAP overlap - both competing open source implementations (Atul Purohit)
- CNTT is MANO agnostic Rabi Abdel
- OSM should be exposing SOL0001- 0005
- What does the LFN recommend - some hybrid of OSM/ONAP? Saad Ullah Sheikh
- CNTT not related
- CNTT help needed in the areas of:
- Governance
- Adoption
- Recruitment
- Technical roadmap
- Would like a doodle poll to see if there is a better time for the EUAG meeting Jim Bakerto create...
Action items
- Atul Purohit send EUAG member feedback and presentations
- Kenny Paul get official reply to OSM relationship w/ ONAP / the LF
- Jim Baker publish doodle poll to see if there is a better time for the EUAG meeting