Day 1 - April 21, 2020
| Track | Key Points | Challenges | Next Steps / AIs |
|---|---|---|---|
Guilin Planning - Requirements Moderator: Alla.Goldner | |||
Guilin Planning - Architecture Moderator: Chaker Al-Hakim | #1 Request to the ONAP Community to review the different templates: #2 Define the scope/role of all the Documentation tools and potential synergy i.e. integrate this “ONAP directory” in readthedocs or www.onap.org, not as a separate landing site | ||
ETSI/CNF - Container Modeling Moderators: Andy Mayer, Hui Deng | #1 ETSI NFV Container Architecture and ModelingUlrich Kleber VNF can use VM-s or containers. CNF is a _Cloud Native_ NF what is a VNF built with the Cloud Native principles in mind ETSI-based CNF support is compliant to IFA029&IFA040 (publication expected in May) Additional information shared by Thinh Nguyenphu : ONAP-ETSI Alignment Workshop (IFA040) #2 CNTT RA2 Tom Kivlin , Gergely Csatari Possibility to run NF on top of what it is defined in RA2 / K8S No conflict/overlap between what ETSI CNF defined and CNTT RA2 (K8S) CNTT Roadmap
#3 CNCF TUG (Lei Wang)
| #1 ETSI approach seems to generalize the capabilities of the container infrastructure layer and may limit the use of the full capabilities of Kubernetes - no recommendation in IFA029. #2 How to refer CNI in the descriptor? Normally no need to have CNI reference in the pod manifest - K8S should evolve to support it but there is currently no solution. #3 Different approaches for CNF Modeling - no conclusion yet from CNCF about the best approach
#4 How can we stay align between ETSI, CNTT, ONAP, CNCF, OVP PH2, etc? | #1 Get Helm Chart sample from ETSI #2 Upload Lei Wang's presentation (done) |
Day 2 - April 22, 2020
| Track | Key Points | Challenges | Next Steps / AIs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guilin Planning | |||
| Security | |||
| ETSI CNF | |||
| Joint Session | |||
| Others |
...