...
- Discuss/define remediation for Gaps, Issues, Scope between CNTT/OPNFV
- Agreed on Areas
- Communications between the groups is lacking, and disruption in progress occurs because of it.
- No agreed upon "RACI"
- Few people are cross community, those that are are overworked
- Feature/Function Stakeholder ownership is lost in Traceability Matrix
- Stakeholders should help provide resources for feature/function development
- Architect and engineer skills are decidedly different
- No Aligned roadmaps
- Action items
- CNTT/OPNFV Requirements gathering processes should be the same with Stakeholders to remain identified and expected to provide resources
- Need community roadmaps that are aligned, with potential long term "roadmap framework"that community roadmaps fit within.
- Need to have more cross community participation without increasing number of meetings and participant workloads (Meeting analysis and effectiveness)
- Identify ways to hold joint meetings to help reduce # and scope of meetings
- Review how meetings are managed, with potential to have more effective ones.
- Must get focused on developing Future Mode for LFN board Meeting on 6/17. Target 6/12 to complete work for board meeting.
- Scot Steele will manage work effort.
- Agreed on Areas
- Define the Pros and Cons of the Current Model
- Not discussed in detail
- Will be addressed in future meetings
- Open the discussion on FMO
- Will be addressed in future meetings
- Set recurring meeting schedule
- One 30 minute and one 1hr meeting per week agreed upon. Targeting Tuesdays and Fridays.
- Jim Baker and Scot Steele to work on schedule