...
| Member | Representing | Member | Representing | Member | Representing | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ODL (TAC) | FD.io (TAC) | x | Orange | x | ||||
| ANUKET (TAC) | x | @Eyal Felstaine | Amdocs | Nokia | ||||
@Anil Guntupalli | Verizon | Cisco | x | TF (incubation) | ||||
@Anil Kapur | Juniper | IBM | x | |||||
| AT&T | x | Huawei | Samsung | x | ||||
| ONAP (TAC) | x | China Mobile | Intel | |||||
| ZTE | Deutsche Telekom | Red Hat | ||||||
| Ericsson | x | Walmart | China Telecom | |||||
| Tech Mahindra | OPX (sandbox) | TBD | XGVela (sandbox) | |||||
| Alex Vul (Deactivated) | ODIM (sandbox) |
LF Staff: Casey Cain Kenny Paul Brandon Wick LJ Illuzzi
...
- Discussion from 2021-04-07 TAC Minutes did not continue via email as anticipated.
- Al Morton would like to see "code contributions" expanded to include specification writers
- Ed Warnicke there are communities have doc or test repos that may not be code specific, so if a repo with Committers then that would be acceptable.
- Discussion regarding contributions versus "Committers"
- Candidates: no disagreement that "Committer Representative" should be the literal Committer as it applies to any repo irrespective of repo contents
- desire to include community defined "contributors" as eligible voters
- Anuket perspective -measurable and repeatable
- Concerns raised about potential for gaming the system if defined more broadly
- Suggested language for what wsconstitutes an eligible voter to be sent to the list and will be voted upon at the next meeting.
Action items
- Casey Cain set up a page for TAC rotation for attendance at TSC calls.