Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Outstanding Action Items

Task report
labelscvc

Minutes

OVP Submissions

  • ZTE Lab submission:
    • Still need technical review of the results.
    • Lincoln Lavoie will assign specific reviewers to handle this review this week.
  • Review of submissions is taking a long time, and seems to require directed calls (i.e. ask specific people to review)
    • Program was founded on the idea of community review, similar to code review, etc.
    • We can start assigning reviewers, but this would seem to run counter to the program intention (i.e. community review process).

OVP 2019.12 Release

  • OVP 2019.1x12 release checklist 
    • Consider pushing back the OVP2019.12 release until after the January plugfest / DDF.
      • If we release after the Plugfest / DDF, it's harder to message the outcome of the plugfest can be certified VNFs.
      • Group agreed to keep the December release target
      • We need to reach out to Dan Xuand the Dovetail team to get assignments and tracking for the release documentation.

Beyond OVP 2019.12 Release

  • TBD

Any other business

None

  • Is orchestration always required to do VNF validation testing?
    • Would this split VNF validation into two "camps" for with and without orchestration (i.e. ONAP)
  • Performance Testing
    • The "hard question," how to test the function of a VNF without prior knowledge of the VNF and "what it does."
    • Could the test environment (i.e. the test setup, packet generator, etc.), where VNF participants would need to submit a standardized "traffic template" along with their VNF for testing.
      • The template will become critical, as this needs to be consumable by the tools and used by others to "check" or "validate" the results.
      • Could this leverage the BBF work to develop Application Layer Testing, which will create data models (information models) for this type of traffic definitions.
  • Rabi Abdel is going to bring in the updated slides that show where testing for be extended in the OPNFV and ONAP cases, taking into account CNTT input, etc.
    • Attachment: 
      View file
      nameCVC_Beyond_2019.pptx
      height150
    • This will be discussed next week, so please review and bring questions and feedback.
  • How is testing invoked in a "user" friendly way?
    • How can this be improved?
    • Avoid purely manual processes?
    • Can we (should we) define guidelines or best practices for how testing is run? For example, could a norm be to use a docker container, that is pulled from a reliable repo (only an idea as an example, not a proposal)?

Any other business

  • Meeting Time:
    • Lincoln Lavoie and Rabi Abdel  to discuss with Bin moving either the CVC call or the OPFNV tech discuss call to avoid the current overlap caused by the time-zone change.