Page Comparison

...

LF Staff: Brandon Wick Jim Baker Kenny Paul Casey Cain

Others: Timo Perala

Agenda

• Start the Recording
• We will start by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.
  • Antitrust Policy
• Roll Call
• Action Items Review
• Agenda Bashing
• General Topics
  • ONES Demo Updates
  • Project Lifecycle and services by lifecycle state LFN Project Benefits by Stage.ods
  • LFN Security Task Force
• Other Updates
  
  • Docker
  • Inclusive Language working group

Minutes

ONES Demo Updates

• Which demo would be appropriate for a long-standing demo to showcase the cross-community LFN collaboration? 
• Any Other Topics

Minutes

Topic 1

• Comments

Topic 2

• CommentsRanny Haiby
  • Would like to see the 5G Cloud Native Network become a long-standing demo
  • Need to continue to enhance/refine the documentation for ease of replication
• Demo pavilion area in ONES Brandon Wick
  • Intent to highlight the work using LFN components and showcase developments by individual developers
  • 5G Cloud Native Network - now includes ONAP - to be shown at Monday 28 Sep 2020 ONES keynote
    • Want to enable others to replicate the demo - moving instructions to wiki
      • Need additional documentation via volunteers
    • Mailing list following demo ~150 members
    • 5G Cloud Native Network Demo Mailing List: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-vco
    • Would like to evolve to include Network Slicing
  • Visit the demo pavilion and see 7 different demo videos
• Other candidates: OVP automation using ONAP and OPNFV
• Proposal: Use the TAC mailing list to request engagement and resources

LFN Services by Project Lifecycle

• Jim Baker presented a proposal to refresh the project lifecycle states to ensure there is a clear expectations of services available to projects at each lifecycle states.
  
  • Ed Warnicke suggests that projects should shift to 0 marginal costs like deploying their own website with hugo + github + netlify. See also: https://gohugo.io/hosting-and-deployment/hosting-on-netlify

LFN Security Task Force

• Problem statement: How do we communicate approaches to security across all the LFN projects?
  • propose: Addendum to LFN technical white paper on how LFN addresses security across the projects
  • propose: LFN wide security working group
    • Ed Warnicke perhaps better done ad hoc due to the different attack surfaces
      • Communication and awareness of other security teams are the key need
  • Need to defer topic to mailing list or next meeting

Action items