Versions Compared

Version Old Version 15 New Version Current
Changes made by

Daniel Havey

LJ Illuzzi

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

...

  • Issue discussion/Dev updates
    • L3AF R2
      • Lightweight RBAC: https://github.com/l3af-project/l3af-arch/discussions/57 

        • Dave- Here's a possible set of ranked evaluation criteria. Feel free to add to, reword, or argue for reordering:

          1. Allows use of existing tools for managing RBAC for other services.
          2. Uses existing mature implementation that is widely understood, used, and actively maintained.
          3. Ability to support multi-level hierarchy of complex scopes and user groups.
          4. Minimize protocol overhead between the client and the L3AFD service.
          5. Standards compliant.
          6. Minimize overhead (CPU, disk, memory) on the L3AFD host.
        • Revised: (See issue on Github)
          1. Allows use of existing tools for managing RBAC for other services.
          2. Uses existing mature implementation that is widely understood, used, and actively maintained.
          3. Extensible (e.g., to support multi-level hierarchy of complex scopes and user groups).
          4. Minimize protocol overhead between the client and the L3AFD service.
          5. Standards compliant.
          6. Minimize overhead (CPU, disk, memory) on the L3AFD host
      • PRs
    • L3AFD v2.1
    • L3AF on Windows
      • LFN Mentorship Program for L3AF on Windows
        • Updates from :
          • 7 applicants (2 complete applications)
          • No interviews yet
          • Next Steps:
            • encourage Mentees to complete applications
            • then, review applications for interviews

...



  • Any Other Business


Action Items

...