Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

2019-11-18 CVC Meeting Minutes

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Current »

Outstanding Action Items

Task report

Looking good, no incomplete tasks.

Minutes

OVP Submissions

  • ZTE Lab submission:
    • Still need technical review of the results.
    • Lincoln Lavoie will assign specific reviewers to handle this review this week.
  • Review of submissions is taking a long time, and seems to require directed calls (i.e. ask specific people to review)
    • Program was founded on the idea of community review, similar to code review, etc.
    • We can start assigning reviewers, but this would seem to run counter to the program intention (i.e. community review process).

OVP 2019.12 Release

  • OVP 2019.1x release checklist 
    • Consider pushing back the OVP2019.12 release until after the January plugfest / DDF.
      • If we release after the Plugfest / DDF, it's harder to message the outcome of the plugfest can be certified VNFs.
      • Group agreed to keep the December release target
      • We need to reach out to Dan Xuand the Dovetail team to get assignments and tracking for the release documentation.

Beyond OVP 2019.12 Release

  • Is orchestration always required to do VNF validation testing?
    • Would this split VNF validation into two "camps" for with and without orchestration (i.e. ONAP)
  • Performance Testing
    • The "hard question," how to test the function of a VNF without prior knowledge of the VNF and "what it does."
    • Could the test environment (i.e. the test setup, packet generator, etc.), where VNF participants would need to submit a standardized "traffic template" along with their VNF for testing.
      • The template will become critical, as this needs to be consumable by the tools and used by others to "check" or "validate" the results.
      • Could this leverage the BBF work to develop Application Layer Testing, which will create data models (information models) for this type of traffic definitions.
  • Rabi Abdel is going to bring in the updated slides that show where testing for be extended in the OPNFV and ONAP cases, taking into account CNTT input, etc.
    • Attachment: 
    • This will be discussed next week, so please review and bring questions and feedback.
  • How is testing invoked in a "user" friendly way?
    • How can this be improved?
    • Avoid purely manual processes?
    • Can we (should we) define guidelines or best practices for how testing is run? For example, could a norm be to use a docker container, that is pulled from a reliable repo (only an idea as an example, not a proposal)?

Any other business

  • Meeting Time:
    • Lincoln Lavoie and Rabi Abdel  to discuss with Bin moving either the CVC call or the OPFNV tech discuss call to avoid the current overlap caused by the time-zone change.
  • No labels