Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

CNTT Next Release starts Sep 25 2020

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 10 Next »

Table of Contents

Overview

Describe the goals of this release ?

  1. Choose a name
  2. Scope noted below
  3. Label update (and documented in Github - link)

Name suggestions ?

  1. Elbrus (highest peak in Europe)
  2. Choose a highest mountain that starts with C (Cho Oyu, 8201 m/26,906 ft, – could use release name of ChoOyu)
  3. Highest mountain on Mars - Olympus
  4. TBD

What is the schedule ?

MilestoneDescriptionDate
M1Release Planning

Friday  

M2Issue Logging

Friday  

vF2FConference

Monday  

M3Freeze Contributions

Friday  

M4Freeze Proofreading

Friday  

M5Release Candidate

Tuesday  

M6Release Signoff

Friday  

To-Do (Spec)

This is a comprehensive list of work that can be done. A subset of the list below will go into  Baraque (and will be saved in the release notes for Baraque).

A: To be included in Baraque Release.

B: Nice to include in Baraque Release.

C: Low Priority for Baraque Release.

Tech


#Deliverable

Complete

( yes/no )

Comments
1

Edge WS: Add Support for Edge Usecase (Outlines ) 


in the usecase part.
2

More generic To cater all technologies ( VM , Containers )




Reference Model


#Deliverable

Complete

( yes/no )

Comments
0NFG: Finalise Networking Modelling 
Finish with stable version
1

NFG: Add HW Accel capabilities (include SmartNIC) 


Based on the modelling done by NFG, SmartNIC support and HW acceleration to be supported by RM.
2

Better Characterisation of Networking and Storage.




3Data-centre Tier Services and how to integrate them tin RM.

4Technically make sure RM supports both Containers as well VMs.
we need to analysis where we need to be more agnostic. 

Reference Architecture 1 (updated September 15)

#Deliverable

Complete

( yes/no )

Comments
1

Edge Computing


Incorporate Edge technologies and deployment considerations

Discussion/Ideas: CNTT Edge - RA01 ( OpenStack ) Architecture - Scenario

2Update Security Chapter
Align with RM Requirements
3Update LCM Chapter
Ensure completeness
4

Add SmartNIC


RM dependency
5Align with RM requirements
Align RM and RA1 requirements

Reference Implementation 1


#Deliverable

Complete

( yes/no )

Comments
1

Finish & Cleanup Lab Requirement

  • Need a Topology Diagram.
  • Need Networking/Switching Requirements.

ch04
2

Descriptor File requirement finalised.

  • Raja to look at this and confirm.

ch05  ch06
3Add more installer general requirement (e.g. the need for it to be opensource, the result of it needs to be opensource).
ch06
4

Finish Cookbook to align with RA-1


ch08
5Finish Lab Cookbook
ch07
6

Need some initial content (are there no gaps? )


ch09

Development (CIRV)


B: Resolve Continuous Software Deployment Errors


B: Document & Perform Repeatable CICD Deployment



B: Descriptor File - finalize & perform PoC

Refer to: 

  • [RI 1 Core]: Work with OPNFV Infra WG for the evolvement of PDF to fit into need for CNTT RI #526
  • [RI 1 Labs] Tooling to Generate a PDF matching Airship Internal Data Structure #525



Reference Conformance 1


#Deliverable

Complete

( yes/no )

Comments
1

Cleanup Chapter 01


Updates to: Ch01: Introduction

don't think LCM should be considered in RC. need discussion within WS

2

Finalise Requirement:

  • Badging/Reporting Requirements.
    • Conformance vs Benchmarking.
  • Framework Requirements.
  • Categories of testing.

Ch02

3

Cleanup and Create Traceability Matrix.

  • Reference to CNTT Req (RM, RA-1).
  • Category (Conformance, Benchmarking).
  • Type: Performance, Functional, etc.
  • High Level Test Case Definition.
  • Criteria (May, Should, Must, Info).
  • Covered in the industry (Yes/No)
  • Reference to Test Project/Name covering it.

Ch03

4Confirm and Validate Cookbook

Ch04 

input will be coming from Field Trials.

Development (CIRV)
1TBD

2







Reference Architecture 2


#Deliverable

Complete

( yes/no )

Comments
1Chapter 2 - platform requirements stable, CNF requirements included, chapter at "Complete" level.
chapter02.md
2Chapter 3 - review wording so that "must" / "should" statements are covered in either chapter02 or chapter04 and this is a description of components and interfaces. Chapter at "Complete" level.
chapter03.md
3Chapter 4 - ensure all specifications have a reference ID, provide specifications for all RI2 requirements for this release. Chapter at "Lots of SME feedback".
chapter04.md
4Chapter 4 - provide specification for all requirements (that can be met). Chapter at "DIckering over the finer points".
chapter04.md
5Chapter 5 - review wording so that "must"/"should" style statements are covered in either chapter02 or chapter04 and this is general guidance for securing Kubernetes and associated add-ons.  Make it clear this does not flow into RC2 tests. Chapter at "Lots of SME feedback".
chapter05.md
6Chapter 6 - ensure any requirements not covered by one or more specifications in chapter04 have a gap documented in this chapter.
chapter06.md

Reference Implementation 2


#Deliverable

Complete

( yes/no )

Comments
1Initial content for introduction. Chapter at "Lots of SME feedback".
chapter01.md
2

Initial content for RI requirements (pull through RA2 specifications) and only add additional requirements if needed. Focus on the desired state. Chapter at "Lots of SME feedback".


chapter02.md
3Initial content for labs requirements - what does any lab need to be able to deploy the Reference Implementation. Chapter at "Still Developing Content".
chapter03.md
4Initial content for lab cookbook - what are the steps anyone needs to run through to deploy the Reference Implementation.  Chapter at "Still Developing Content".
chapter04.md

Development













Reference Conformance 2


#Deliverable

Complete

( yes/no )

Comments
1initial content for introduction
ch01
2

initial content of requirement:

  • Badging/Reporting Requirements.
    • Conformance vs Benchmarking.
  • Framework Requirements.
  • Categories of testing.

ch02
3

Iniitial Traceability Matrix.

  • Reference to CNTT Req (RM, RA-1).
  • Category (Conformance, Benchmarking).
  • Type: Performance, Functional, etc.
  • High Level Test Case Definition.
  • Criteria (May, Should, Must, Info).
  • Covered in the industry (Yes/No)
  • Reference to Test Project/Name covering it.

ch03




Development













Misc - Officers and Collaboration Topics

#Deliverable

Complete

( yes/no )

Comments
1

CVC Alignment (Trevor Lovett)


From an CVC/OVP perspective:

  1. Minimum viable set of requirements and tests to include in the first iteration of the badge (doesn't have to be every requirement tested initially)
  2. Commitment that the test suite will produce results in a format compatible with the OVP portal.
  3. Anything else, generally defer to CNTT for what is most valuable to define and test
2


3


4


  • No labels