2019-09-11 Meeting notes

Date

Sep 11, 2019

Attendees

LF Staff: @Kenny Paul @Casey Cain @Trishan de Lanerolle @Jim Baker
Committee Members: @Bin Hu @djhunt @Ranny Haiby  @VM (Vicky) Brasseur @Olaf Renner @Wenjing Chu @Frank Brockners @Davide Cherubini @FREEMAN, BRIAN D @Abhijit K @Marc Fiedler @Ed Warnicke @Morgan Richomme @danny lin 
Proxies: @Christian Olrog Atlassian (for Anders Rosengren, Ericsson) @Chaker Al-Hakim (proxy for @cl664y@att.com ONAP), @Manuel Buil (proxy for @Rossella Sblendido SUSE) @Trevor Cooper (for @Timothy Verrall (Deactivated) Intel)
Guests: @Joseph Gasparakis (Tungsten Fabric)

Agenda

• Start the Recording

• Antitrust Policy

• Agenda Bashing (Roll Call, Action Items (5 minutes)

• General Topics

  • Committer Representative to the Board - Vote on options - @Frank Brockners @Abhijit K

  • TAC meeting at ONS - logistics, attendance, agenda

  • Retiring projects - guidance sought - @Chaker Al-Hakim @cl664y@att.com

  • Project Budget Guidance - pointer to materials for TAC members awareness

  • TAC readout to LFN Governing Board meeting - @djhunt

  • TAC Attendance

  • LF IT Modernization update

Minutes

Committer Rep to the Board:

• FB: The options on who would be eligible and who could vote were discussed and presented so that each option could be voted on.

  • A discussion was had about what defines an "active" committer.

  • The definition of  "committer" is well defined in all charters as "Committers are Contributors who have earned the ability to modify (“commit”)
    source code, documentation or other technical artifacts in a project’s repository"

    • "The primary distinguishing characteristic of Committers is a demonstrated history of
      performing code reviews in the project code review system. References to quantity
      and/or quality of code reviews (of other Contributors’ code, not the Committer’s own
      code) should be given predominant weight when voting on the addition or removal of
      a Committer"

  • Zoom vote:

    • Initial consensus poll drives the vote on the election method - All committers every cycle received the most votes in the poll

    • Shall the TAC adopt the policy for electing a Committer Representative to the Board that All committers are Eligible and they will cycle every year?

      • Vote passes with 94%

      • Vote Record

  • Discussion of details will be on the next meeting agenda

TAC meeting at ONS - Weds evening

• Planned attendees: Jason, Abhijit, Brian, Olaf, Vicky, Wenjing, Chaker, Manuel, Marc, Morgan, Davide, Christian 

GB presentation materials review @djhunt

• Wording change on title to add "Additional" to Future TAC duties

ONAP Lifecycle Process @Chaker Al-Hakim

• There are gaps in the existing process - reviewing with the TAC for feedback / recommendations for input

• Looking for guidance - ultimately an ONAP TSC decision

• Discussion here may also be relevant to other LFN Projects

• Chaker to share the presentation and solicit email feedback

Action items