Call for ONAP DDF Topics - Prague 2020
Slides have been uploaded to 2020 Prague Developer & Testing Forum Schedule
Please add your suggestions for the ONAP DDF below. Timeline for topic selection is:
Initial proposals due for review by the ONAP Program Committee Nov 29, 2019
Final review and selections Dec 12, 2019
There is a strong need to align the selection early. This is response to feedback from previous events and due to the evolution of LFN events in general§
Expectations for stronger developer engagement
Less slide-ware and more doing work. Topics that are development oriented are more likely to be selected for the Prague event. Gå till slutet av bannern
Expectations for a better managed agenda
Lots of frustration in the past over sessions getting created, changed and cancelled in an adhoc fashion.
There are going to be concurrent tracks from OPNFV and CNTT in addition to ONAP.
The number and size of meeting rooms available to ONAP is likely to be less than we have previously enjoyed.
Program Committee
@Eric Debeau @Davide Cherubini @Alla.Goldner @Timo Perala @Chaker Al-Hakim
onap-program-committee@lists.onap.org
Topics
- 1 <Sample Topic>
- 2 ONAP SECCOM F2F
- 3 ONAP SECCOM Working session – testable VNF security requirements
- 4 ONAP SECCOM Joint discussion with CNTT on security like security requirements
- 5 ONAP SECCOM Status update OOM password removal
- 6 ONAP SECCOM Status update ingress controller introduction
- 7 ONAP ISTIO common discussion
- 8 ONAP SECCOM Communication matrix update – diagram and interactions from it
- 9 ONAP TSC General Meeting
- 10 Cross-Carrier 5G Slicing Roaming Use Case
- 11 ONAP TSC Member Roundtable
- 12 Platform Maturity Requirements (S3P) for Guilin
- 13 O-RAN / OSC rel A / ONAP joint PoC/PlugFest results and next steps
- 14 CDS Integration with K8S workloads
- 15 Change Management Requirements for Guilin and beyond
- 16 VNFC action level support in controllers
- 17 ONAP and JIRA - Discussion of Best Practices and a Proposal for Improvement
- 18 CSMF and NSMF portal design in 5g slicing usecase
- 19 Service Orchestrator Roadmap
- 20 Plug and Play in ONAP - Learnings of a developer
- 21 Analysis and suggestions of ONAP's multi tenant transformation
- 22 Cross-project AI Cooperation and Innovation
- 23 ONAP & MEC - Leverage ONAP to build MEC Mangement Layer
- 24 Convergence Exploration between ONAP and OVP
- 25 AI Innovation with ONAP: EPC intelligent energy optimization
- 26 The methods and implementation of UUI frontend architecture
- 27 How to build a MEP via open source and manage it with ONAP
- 28 Etsicatalog Overview - Catalog & Generic parser Service
- 29 SO implementation in E2E Network slicing usecase
- 30 E2E Network Slicing: Roadmap beyond Frankfurt
- 31 5G Network Slicing Model (will be scheduled as part of Modeling SubC session)
- 32 Control Loop SubCommittee - Roadmap and Guilin Requirements Planning
- 33 HPA Pluggable in Multicloud
- 34 Leveraging HPA in IPsec use case: From VNF to CNF
- 35 Development Experience Sharing of PNF Software Upgrade Use Case
- 36 5G NRM Configuration with Restful protocol
- 37 ONAP Project Lifecycle & Reviews
- 38 ONAP Release Cadence Proposal
- 39 Policy Framework Frankfurt Improvements
- 40 Modeling subcommittee
- 41 SO – deploying custom BPMN workflows (with code) in run-time
- 42 OOM - What's new
- 43 OOM - Introduction of Service mesh
- 44 Test - Introduction to ONAP python SDK
- 45 Integration - Gating retrospective
- 46 Integration - Performance and Robustness tests for future releases
- 47 Integration - Discussion on the test strategy evolution in ONAP
- 48 ONAP Usability - Current status and Frankfurt objectives
- 49 DataLake Data Exposure Service and its application in 5G slicing use case
- 50 Transport Slicing: How to evolve CCVPN to a multi-layer slicing and abstraction solution
- 51 SECCOM CMPv2 support in Application Authorization Framework (AAF)
- 52 Collaboration between 3GPP (and other SDOs) and ONAP - practical ways of working
- 53 How to reverse-engineer and document data models using Papyrus
- 54 PM Control use case
- 55 Ingress controller status update
- 56 Password removal status update and examples
- 57 Demo - Integration of Policy and OOF for Frankfurt - Policy Design and Decision API demonstration
- 58 ONAP Use case subcommittee F2F
- 59 ETSI Alignment Support Status and Plan
- 60 ONAP Documentation
- 61 ONAP security requirements: clean-up & finalization of the review
<Sample Topic>
Short Description: One line description of topic
Detailed Description: Detailed description of topic
Topic Leader: name 1, name 2, ...
Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50):
Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.
ONAP SECCOM F2F
Short Description: SECCOM F2F
Detailed Description: This session will provide to SECCOM and ONAP community to exchange all security concerns
Topic Leader: @Pawel Pawlak @Amy Zwarico
Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): 1-15
Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible
@Pawel Pawlak
@Amy Zwarico
@Krzysztof Opasiak
@Natacha Mach
@hampus.tjader
@Harald Fuchs
@Pawel Baniewski
@Samuli Kuusela
@Eric Debeau
ONAP SECCOM Working session – testable VNF security requirements
Short Description: ONAP SECCOM Working session
Detailed Description: This session will provide to SECCOM and ONAP community oportunity to exchange on testable VNF security requirements
Topic Leader: @Amy Zwarico
Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): 1-15
Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible
@Pawel Pawlak
@Amy Zwarico
ONAP SECCOM Joint discussion with CNTT on security like security requirements
Short Description: ONAP SECCOM and CNTT F2F meeting
Detailed Description: This session will provide to ONAP SECCOM and CNTT security professionals oportunity to exchange on security topics
Topic Leader: @Pawel Pawlak @Amy Zwarico
Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): 15-30
Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible
@Pawel Pawlak
@Amy Zwarico
ONAP SECCOM Status update OOM password removal
Short Description: SECCOM update
Detailed Description: This session will provide to SECCOM and ONAP community oportunity to exchange on OOM password removal
Topic Leader: @Krzysztof Opasiak
Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): 1-15
Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible
@Krzysztof Opasiak
@Pawel Pawlak
@Amy Zwarico
ONAP SECCOM Status update ingress controller introduction
Short Description: SECCOM update
Detailed Description: This session will provide to SECCOM and ONAP community oportunity to exchange on ingress controller introduction
Topic Leader: @Krzysztof Opasiak
Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): 1-15
Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible
@Krzysztof Opasiak
@Pawel Pawlak
@Amy Zwarico
ONAP ISTIO common discussion
Short Description: ISTIO discussion
Detailed Description: This session is a community opportunity for discussing ISTIO. It was requested by SECCOM. No presentation or status update will be made. Initial suggestion was to remove this item from the agenda due to no status update, but it could be used as discussion session directly after the other Service Mesh presentation.
Topic Leader: @hampus.tjader
Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): 1-15
Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible
@Pawel Pawlak
@Amy Zwarico
ONAP SECCOM Communication matrix update – diagram and interactions from it
Short Description: SECCOM update
Detailed Description: This session will provide to SECCOM and ONAP community oportunity to exchange on first outputs coming from DCAE pilot
Topic Leader: @Natacha Mach
Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): 1-15
Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible
@Natacha Mach
@Pawel Pawlak
@Amy Zwarico
@Eric Debeau
ONAP TSC General Meeting
Short Description: Standard weekly TSC Meeting
Detailed Description: Meeting agenda here https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/TSC 2020-01-16 Prague F2F
Topic Leader: @Kenny Paul (Deactivated)
Estimated Audience Size (>50):
Special Consideration: Thursday, January 16, 2020 at 3:00 pm
Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.
@Kenny Paul (Deactivated)
@David McBride
@cl664y@att.com
@Jason Hunt
@Andreas Geißler
@Pamela Dragosh
@William DIEGO (Orange)
@David Perez Caparros
@Eric Debeau
Cross-Carrier 5G Slicing Roaming Use Case
Short Description: introduce the implementation of automatic service continuity and life-cycle management of 5G network slices of devices roaming across Operators.
Detailed Description:
This session will present options for 5G slice continuity when devices roam across International borders (e.g., standard slices vs. slice blueprint export vs. Virtual home slice) and then identify and implement the necessary logic, APIs and models in ONAP for Guilin release.
Topic Leader: @Davide Cherubini @Kalyan.Asangi
Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): 15-30
Interested In Attending:
If you are interested in discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.
@cl664y@att.com
@Morgan Richomme
@LIN MENG
@David Perez Caparros
ONAP TSC Member Roundtable
Short Description: Informal meeting to bring the 2020 TSC members together and to define 2020 TSC priorities
Detailed Description: Intros and sharing of thoughts and ideas for 2020
Topic Leader: @Kenny Paul (Deactivated) @cl664y@att.com
Estimated Audience Size (15-30):
Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.
@Kenny Paul (Deactivated)
@David McBride
@Jason Hunt
@Andreas Geißler
@Eric Debeau
@Davide Cherubini
@Alessandro D'Alessandro
Platform Maturity Requirements (S3P) for Guilin
Short Description: Review & discuss changes to platform maturity (S3P) requirements for Guilin release
Detailed Description: The ONAP Platform Maturity level definitions and required levels have remained static for the past few releases. In this session we will review feedback from the project teams (to be gathered prior to the session) & discuss what changes can be made to the requirements so that ONAP can improve its maturity posture in a way that projects can easily achieve. Please join to have your voice heard.
Topic Leader: @Jason Hunt
O-RAN / OSC rel A / ONAP joint PoC/PlugFest results and next steps
Short Description: Results of 5G RAN & xHaul PoC/PlugFest taking place December 5, 2019, and interactive discussion of next steps
Detailed Description: O-RAN O1 interface specification, OAM architecture, and IM/UML/YANG 5G RAN & xHaul equipment, with ONAP 5G use cases, e.g., PNF Plug and Play, Bulk PM, OOF-based optimization; https://wiki.o-ran-sc.org/x/egBv
Topic Leader: @Tracy Van Brakle
Estimated Audience Size (>50):
Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.
@Jason Hunt
@Morgan Richomme
@William DIEGO (Orange)
@Davide Cherubini
@Alessandro D'Alessandro
@Eric Debeau
CDS Integration with K8S workloads
Short Description: Ongoing work on integration of CDS with K8s workloads on vFW use case example & plans of further changes
Detailed Description: In Dublin release was ported to K8s workloads what was showcasing first CNF management mechanisms in ONAP. Unfortunately, VNF-API and A'la carte instantiation method was used what requires SDNC preloading and additional manual step related with configuration of K8s service profile. For Frankfurt release vFW K8s use case will be integrated with CDS what will simplify and will automate more the instantiation of service and additionally will eliminate the need of manual creation of K8s service profile. The presentation will be extended with demonstration of the implemented K8s service instantiation.
Topic Leader: @Lukasz Rajewski @s.silvius @Konrad Bańka @Eric Multanen (Deactivated)
Estimated Audience Size (15-30):
Interested In Attending:
@Pawel Baniewski
@Andreas Geißler
@Morgan Richomme
@David Perez Caparros
@Alessandro D'Alessandro
Change Management Requirements for Guilin and beyond
Short Description: The presentation will outline still existing change management problems and how to address them in Guilin+ releases.
Detailed Description: There are still major problems that make the change management operations complex like: lack of service model upgrade mechanism which will upgrade existing instances of services; limitations with design, composition and execution of workflows in SO on service, vnf/pnf/cnf and vnfc level; lack of upgrade strategy in service model which should guide on how the upgrade can be performed when there is a change from version X→Y, X → Z, Y→Z; parallel execution of SO workflows; runtime optimization and coordination of executed SO workflows and SO building blocks; dynamic selection of vnfc/vf-module with OOF for the SO workflow execution realized on VNF level. The presentation will be an occasion also to discuss with the community about the future expected changes to the change management process in ONAP.
Topic Leader: @Lukasz Rajewski @Ajay MahimkarChris Rapasoli @Zu Qiang
Estimated Audience Size (15-30):
Interested In Attending:
@David McBride
@David Perez Caparros
VNFC action level support in controllers
Short Description: The presentation will outline VNFC level reconfiguration problem and how it is mitigated today what makes ONAP not so ready for carrier-grade deployments
Detailed Description: Today in many of existing use cases there are performed anonymous reconfiguration and LCM actions on VNFC level by configuration on VNF level. This happens in example in vLB/vDNS ScaleOut or vFW Traffic Distribution use cases where specifically adapted VNF reconfiguration pattern is applied. This approach cannot be repeated on carrier-grade scale, with services instances having many vf-modules or many VNFC types or many LCM actions . In consequence, ONAP is not ready for carrier grade reconfiguration today as long as VNF does not have its internal LCM controller. This problem is a consequence of lack of support for VNFC level reconfigurations in the controllers and in SO. In this presentation on examples we will show how VNFC level configuration is hacked today and what are the potential solutions for that. The topic will be shown on examples and code from use cases realized in ONAP.
Topic Leader: @Lukasz Rajewski @Scott Blandford @Marco Platania @Ajay Mahimkar
Estimated Audience Size (15-30):
Interested In Attending:
@Pamela Dragosh
@David Perez Caparros
ONAP and JIRA - Discussion of Best Practices and a Proposal for Improvement
Short Description: ONAP and JIRA - a discussion of best practices and a proposal for improvements
Detailed Description: JIRA has been used to good effect in the ONAP project. In particular, tracking of milestone requirements, and release requirements were introduced this year. However, there are additional improvements that can be made, especially to JIRA hygiene to make JIRA even more effective. This session will discuss 1) current practice; 2) best practices; 3) some specific improvements that individual users can make NOW; 4) interactive tips and tricks for using JIRA effectively; 5) opportunity to ask questions about JIRA.
Topic Leader: @David McBride
Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): 1 - 15
Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.
@cl664y@att.com
CSMF and NSMF portal design in 5g slicing usecase
Short Description: Will present the design ideas and content of CSMF and NSMF portal
Detailed Description: This topic will introduce the design starting point of NSMF and CSMF portal, as well as the design content, from the perspective of enterprise users and operator operators, including order management, slice business management, and KPI presentation content.
Topic Leader: @perry peng (Deactivated)
Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): 1 - 15
Interested In Attending: If you are interested in discussion .and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.
@cl664y@att.com
@Andreas Geißler
@Lukasz Rajewski
@Syed Moneeb Javed
@David Perez Caparros
@Alessandro D'Alessandro
Service Orchestrator Roadmap
Short Description: The presentation will outline the roadmap of the Service Orchestrator project and provides discussion points for the community to share thoughts
Detailed Description: The intension is to provide the audience the thoughts on the whats next in ONAP SO and provide a launch pad to get consensus. This is more to get the community alignment on some of the current thoughts of the SO project team and get them to a bigger audience to get more thoughts and helping hands.
Topic Leader: @Seshu Kumar Mudiganti
Plug and Play in ONAP - Learnings of a developer
Short Description: The presentation will highlight learnings from Demos as part of the various events
Detailed Description: The topic swould present the implementation details of some of the usecases / functional requirements we developed using the plug and play funtional aspects of ONAP SO and talk about the the problems we faced and their resolutions. It would also give the details of the code impacts , module details for someone who would like to do a replication of what we did.
Topic Leader: @Seshu Kumar Mudiganti @Isaac Manuel Raj
Estimated Audience Size (15-30):
Interested In Attending: Developers who intend to develop integration points / adaptors to ONAP
@Pawel Baniewski
@Lukasz Rajewski
@David Perez Caparros
Analysis and suggestions of ONAP's multi tenant transformation
Short Description: Share and discuss ONAP multi tenant transformation
Detailed Description: Share why we need multi tenancy, what multi tenancy transformation attempts we have made at present, and discuss how ONAP will support multi tenancy in the future.
Topic Leader: @beiyuan zhang
Estimated Audience Size (1-15):
Interested In Attending:
@cl664y@att.com
@Davide Cherubini
@Alessandro D'Alessandro
Cross-project AI Cooperation and Innovation
Short Description: Discuss how to carry out AI collaboration across open source communities and standards organizations, collaborative content, roadmaps for R&D, etc.
Detailed Description: This topic discusses how ONAP can work with other open source communities or standards organizations on AI-based collaborative innovation, use cases, scenarios, etc.
Topic Leader: @Lingli Deng
Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): > 50
Interested In Attending: If you are interested in discussion .and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.
@David McBride
@William DIEGO (Orange)
ONAP & MEC - Leverage ONAP to build MEC Mangement Layer
Short Description: Discuss how to leverage ONAP components to build a MEC Management layer system.
Detailed Description: This topic try to discuss how ONAP can work in the edge area and how to leverage the existing system to satisfy the edge management layer requirement and the stands (e.g. ETSI, etc).
Topic Leader: @victor gao @Seshu Kumar Mudiganti
Estimated Audience Size (15-30 ):
Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.
@Jason Hunt
@Lukasz Rajewski
@Davide Cherubini
@Alessandro D'Alessandro
Convergence Exploration between ONAP and OVP
Short Description: will present the OVP VNF verification which has been done based on ONAP and discuss more about how to leverage ONAP to accelerate and automate OVP verification and testing.
Detailed Description: Introduce the OVP VNF validation based on ONAP and discuss what is missing about OVP and how to improve the OVP verification and testing
Topic Leader: @Yan Yang @Kanag
Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): 30-50
Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.
@David McBride
@cl664y@att.com
@Davide Cherubini
AI Innovation with ONAP: EPC intelligent energy optimization
Short Description: Will present how to leverage ONAP to build one intelligent energy optimization system for EPC.
Detailed Description: This topic will introduce the power saving proposed and developed by the ONAP , with a special attention to the Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML) aspects, in the context defined by the core network.
Topic Leader: @Liexiang Yue
Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): 1-15
Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.