Attendees:

Please add your name in here:

• @Pankaj.Goyal (AT&T)

• @Walter.kozlowski (telstra)

• @Gergely Csatari (Nokia) (Nokia)

• @Ulrich Kleber (Huawei)

• @Tom Van Pelt (Deactivated) (GSMA)

• @Toshi Wakayama (KDDI)

Special Notes:

• Given the limited time available, we will focus on identifying issues/actions/next steps, but not solving them right now

• Weekly RM meetings are intended to

  • Identify owners for new Issues

  • Track open Issues

  • Address technical issues that cannot be resolved online (i.e. resolve stalls)

Agenda:

• Linux Foundation Anti-Trust Policy Notice

• GSMA Anti-Trust Policy Notice

• Agenda bashing

• Walk in items

  • Ch8.2 RA1 Gaps are not related to RA1, but RM. The proposal is to move them to the RM

    • @Walter.kozlowski to create an issue against RM to move the Gaps to the RM

• Backlog issue review for Baraque

  • Issue https://github.com/cntt-n/CNTT/issues/1598 asks us to review the backlog to promote issues for Baraque (by removing the backlog label and assigning the M3 milestone to them)

  • As a review, the priorities for Baraque are here CNTT Baraque#ReferenceModel and repeated below (H: high, M: medium, L: Low)

    • H: Better characterization of Networking and Storage

    • H: Technically Make sure RM supports both Containers as well as VMs

    • M: Data-center tier services and how to integrate them within RM

    • H: NFG: Add Hw Acceleration Capabilities (including SmartNIC)

    • Proposal:

      • Change the priority of "NFG: Add Hw Acceleration Capabilities (including SmartNIC)" to H

        • @Gergely Csatari (Nokia) to update CNTT Baraque#ReferenceModel

  • Additionally, document clean-up issues are also considered for inclusion.

  • The following issues are proposed for addressing in the Baraque release

    1. [RM Ch01] Language #1542

    2. [WSRM Ch08] Chapter 8 references and images are not consistent #1439

    3. [WSRM Chx05] RM_chap5_fig_5_3_SW_profile.png is redundant #1421

    4. [RM, RAs] Harmonisation of VNF & CNF in CNTT #1359

    5. [Tech Approach]- Fix Figure 1-3: Network Layering #1321

    6. [RM CH09] 9.1 Content #1251

    7. [RM Ch04 & Ch05] Consistency #816

    8. [RM Ch04] Virtual network specifications need rework #587

    9. [RM Ch04] Disaggregate the Storage Extensions Matrix #308

    10. [RM Ch03] Intra networks #195

    11. RM Ch05] Storage part to be reviewed #143

    12. [RM Ch05] 5.1.4 Security #1583

    13. [RM Ch04] Section 4.2.6 Cloud Infrastructure Profile Performance Measurement Mapping #1582

    14. [RM Appendix A] SR-IOV writeup #1306

    15. [RM CH04] Table 4-24 doe not map to the acceleration extensions #962

    16. [RM CH04] Table 4-24 #958

    17. [RM CH04] Table 4-24 #957

    18. [RM Appendix-A] [Clarifying Transitional Plan for VNF Design] #678 - (review and see if current VNF evolution framework + exceptions framework cover the issue.)

    19. [RM Ch04] Information about how to incorporate NFVI acceleration technology #155 - (review and see if current VNF evolution framework + exceptions framework cover the issue.)

    20. [RM Ch10] Gap: Need Artifact to Deliver CNTT Parms #255

  • We checked the issues in the meeting until this point

  • Propose to not address during Baraque

    1. [RM Ch 9] OM&A requirements #663

    2. [RM Ops ] Ch09 LCM : Define of Generic installer #586

    3. [RM Ch09] More Operation and LCM Requirement #365

  • Propose to close due to age, duplication, and/or changes in perspective

    1. [RM Appendix A] Text on decoupling app from infra #790 (issue already appears addressed via other PRs)

    2. [RM] Add Storage intensive Profile #250 (request is speculative, and demand has not yet arisen directly)

    3. [RM Ch03] Bonding, ACP, redundency need to be defined #183 (Not an RM-level issue?)

    4. [RM Ch08] Include VNF Requirements and Analysis #163 (Seems to be RI/RC-level content)

    5. [RM Ch08] Assess Trace-ability and Backward Compatibility Test Considersations #216 (should tracing be done solely from RI/RC perspective?)

    6. [RM Ch07] More Security requirements #366 (Platform vs. workload security requirements have been addressed in other PRs)

Actions:

• @Walter.kozlowski to create an issue against RM to move the Gaps to the RM

• @Gergely Csatari (Nokia) to update CNTT Baraque#ReferenceModel

Minutes:

• Embedded to the agenda