...
- AR- Igor was going to do some more research on the issue tracking options and provide insights to help move towards a vote to choose which option we will use- Done
- Review today
- See related document here
New Agenda Items:
Debrief on TAC Induction-
- Issue with Technical Charter - TSC Composition
- Address TSC Growth criteria
- Address PTL - Suggested at least Core and UI to start with
- We were asked to articulate positioning- Call for use cases and derive clearer message on Edge positioning
- Open Horizon, and Baetyl positioning
Review Draft Board slide (Louis)
...
More Use Cases listed- Positioning of EMCO
Minutes:
Bob and Louis will work offline to propose changes to correct mismatch on Technical Charter with current TSC makeup.
We will bring up the topics of PTLs at a future meeting.
Oleg from Equinix did propose a use case from an Akraino BP and will overview this at a future meeting- Bob to schedule and post a link in Use Case Wiki page.
Bob asked other participants who have been evaluation and using EMCO, or anyone with ideas about use cases for EMCO, please add a link /doc on use cases on the same Use Case WIki page.
We reviewed the LFN Board Slide Louis will need to present to LFN Gov Board in next 2 weeks.
Several changes were recomended, and Bob will add a reference to Intel donated lab resources.
Igor went over an extensive demo of the usability and features of GitLab Issues and JIRA to give the TSC a better idea of the pros and cons. We ran out of time but will continue the discussion next meeting.
Seed code scan feedback:
There are six files in emco-base with Intel "confidential / proprietary" notices that should be remediated. These are:
...