TSC Meeting Agenda and Minutes 28Sept2021



Attendees:

@Bob Monkman (Deactivated) (Intel)

@Igor Duarte Cardoso (Intel)

@Timo Perala (Nokia)

@kumarcv (Verizon)

@Victor Morales (Samsung)

@Sharad Mishra (Intel)

@LJ Illuzzi(LFN)

@Milind Jalwadi (Tech Mahindra)

@Eric Multanen (Intel)

@Ritu Sood (Deactivated)(Intel)

@Amar Kapadia(Aarna Networks)

@cathy zhang(Intel)

@Anbu Ganesh(CanGo Networks)

28 September Agenda is:

Anti-Trust 

Opens? 

Review Open ARs: 

  • AR- Igor was going to do some more research on the issue tracking options and provide insights to help move towards a vote to choose which option we will use-  Done



New Agenda Items: 

Debrief on TAC Induction-

  • Issue with Technical Charter  - TSC Composition

  • Address TSC Growth criteria

  • Address PTL - Suggested at least Core and UI to start with

  • We were asked to articulate positioning- Call for use cases and derive clearer message on Edge positioning

    • Open Horizon, and Baetyl positioning

Review Draft Board slide (Louis)

Igor - Demo on JIRA v GitLab Issues pros/cons

Seed code. Ready for license scan, need repo to be Public

Should we skip TSC meeting Oct 12 due to ONE Summit?

GitLab Open Source Program: https://about.gitlab.com/solutions/open-source/join/



Open Discussion & Next Steps







Future Agenda Items:

Resource needs from LF

Launch Discussions...

EMCO position in 5G Super BluePrint? (Already being used via OpenNESS components, which in fact is in EMCO already) 

More Use Cases listed- Positioning of EMCO





Minutes:

Bob and Louis will work offline to propose changes to correct mismatch on Technical Charter with current TSC makeup. 

We will bring up the topics of PTLs at a future meeting. 

Oleg from Equinix did propose a use case from an Akraino BP and will overview this at a future meeting- Bob to schedule and post a link in Use Case Wiki page. 

Bob asked other participants who have been evaluation and using EMCO, or anyone with ideas about use cases for EMCO, please add a link /doc on use cases on the same Use Case WIki page. 

We reviewed the LFN Board Slide Louis will need to present to LFN Gov Board in next 2 weeks. 

Several changes were recomended, and Bob will add a reference to Intel donated lab resources. 



Igor went over an extensive demo of the usability and features of GitLab Issues and JIRA to give the TSC a better idea of the pros and cons. We ran out of time but will continue the discussion next meeting. 



Seed code scan feedback:

There are six files in emco-base with Intel "confidential / proprietary" notices that should be remediated. These are:

  • /deployments/helm/emcoBase/hpa-ac/Chart.yaml

  • /deployments/helm/emcoBase/hpa-ac/templates/configmap.yaml

  • /src/clm/api/controllerhandler_test.go

  • /deployments/helm/emcoBase/hpa-ac/templates/deployment.yaml

  • /deployments/helm/emcoBase/hpa-ac/requirements.yaml

  • /deployments/helm/emcoBase/hpa-ac/templates/service.yaml

If Intel had contributed these, you'll want to ask someone from Intel to remove the notices and replace them with Apache-2.0 notices. Or if someone not from Intel had contributed these, then the files themselves should likely be removed from the repo.