Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • EUAG chair elections
    • Atul Purohit nominated and was unoppoosed - Congratulations Atul our new EUAG chair!
  • DDF results review Atul Purohit
    • Review of the DDF discussions 
    • See demo page
    • Atul to look at options to track action items - AI on the minutes OR using EUAG jira
  • LFN MAC positioning statement Heather Kirksey Jill Lovato
    • Pointer from Email send by Brandon Wick 
    • Messaging is LFN wide - not project specific
    • Questions:
      • ONAP is not a standard - rather it's based on ETSI/GSMA/etc. - is there some documentation of the relationship between the projects and the SDOs?
        • ONAP has specific liaisons but not a centralized source of LFN SDO engagements - readouts are given at TSC meetings from time to time
      • There is some written agreement with ETSI, can you describe this?
        • ONAP is broader than ETSI - but don't know the scope of the agreement
        • With ETSI there is an agreement of ONAP subset implemented 
        • AI - provide the ETSI/ONAP agreement Jim Baker
      • The value to service providers having a service that works with existing OAM (interop AND operationally compatible) 
        • Both a reduction of effort and clarity of responsibility/reduced TTM
        • Telcos VS over-the-top players rate of change is very high - LFN helps this competitive pace
        • Consistent architecture is another benefit - SDOs do not help get consistent implementation - just consensus 
      • Seems a little ONAP centric - are there other project related proof points?
        • Perhaps a case study may be more appropriate?
          • Go direct to the ODL technical community - Contact Casey Cain
  • L0/L1 Optical Networks Carrier Interconnection – scope : ONAP/CCVPN and ODL/Transport-pce FREEMAN, BRIAN D

View file
nameEUAG L1 Interconnect PoC 19-07-02.pptx
height250


Action items