EUAG 2019-07-02 Meeting notes

Date

Jul 2, 2019

Attendees

LF staff: @Jim Baker @Jill Lovato  @Heather Kirksey @David McBride @Kenny Paul

EUAG: @Atul Purohit @Saad Ullah Sheikh @FREEMAN, BRIAN D @Marc-Alexandre Choquette @javier Ger @Randy Levensalor 

Guests: @Scott Blandford

Agenda

• Start the Recording

• Antitrust Policy

• Agenda Bashing (Roll Call, Action Items (5 minutes)

• EUAG chair elections @Jim Baker

• DDF results review, action items and next steps @Atul Purohit

• LFN MAC positioning statement - Q&A (previously distributed via email) @Heather Kirksey  

• L0/L1 Optical Networks Carrier Interconnection – scope : ONAP/CCVPN and ODL/Transport-pce” @FREEMAN, BRIAN D @Olivier Augizeau

Minutes

• EUAG chair elections

  • @Atul Purohit nominated and was unoppoosed - Congratulations Atul our new EUAG chair!

• DDF results review @Atul Purohit

  • Review of the DDF discussions 

  • See demo page

  • Atul to look at options to track action items - AI on the minutes OR using EUAG jira

• LFN MAC positioning statement @Heather Kirksey @Jill Lovato

  • Pointer from Email send by Brandon Wick 

  • Messaging is LFN wide - not project specific

  • Questions:

    • ONAP is not a standard - rather it's based on ETSI/GSMA/etc. - is there some documentation of the relationship between the projects and the SDOs?

      • ONAP has specific liaisons but not a centralized source of LFN SDO engagements - readouts are given at TSC meetings from time to time

    • There is some written agreement with ETSI, can you describe this?

      • ONAP is broader than ETSI - but don't know the scope of the agreement

      • With ETSI there is an agreement of ONAP subset implemented 

      • AI - provide the ETSI/ONAP agreement @Jim Baker

    • The value to service providers having a service that works with existing OAM (interop AND operationally compatible) 

      • Both a reduction of effort and clarity of responsibility/reduced TTM

      • Telcos VS over-the-top players rate of change is very high - LFN helps this competitive pace

      • Consistent architecture is another benefit - SDOs do not help get consistent implementation - just consensus 

    • Seems a little ONAP centric - are there other project related proof points?

      • Perhaps a case study may be more appropriate?

        • Go direct to the ODL technical community - Contact @Casey Cain

• L0/L1 Optical Networks Carrier Interconnection – scope : ONAP/CCVPN and ODL/Transport-pce @FREEMAN, BRIAN D

  • Presentation intention - share activities and seek engagement

  • @Javier - Fragmentation between LFN projects and SDOs

    • connection between ONAP and BSS is poorly defined - is there an effort to standardize?

    • @FREEMAN, BRIAN D more work needed,  MEF & TMF discussions are necessary to understand the different approaches

    • Calls are Wednesdays @ 8AM Eastern https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Meeting+Minutes+-+Optical+Usecase - Contact Denise Provencher for invite (denise.provencher@us.fujitsu.com)
      
      

  • slides presented during the call

Action items