Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.


Please add your suggestions for the ONAP DDF below. Timeline for topic selection is:

...

  • Short Description:  Control Loop sub committee working session

  • Detailed Description: This working meeting will include Control Loop Roadmap, Frankfurt status updates as well as for the team to start vetting out requirements for the Guilin Release: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Control+Loop+Sub+Committee+Guilin+Release+Planning
  • Topic Leader: Pamela Dragosh TBD
  • Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): 1-15
  • Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.

HPA Pluggable in Multicloud

  • Short Description:  Introduce HPA Pluggable in Multicloud

  • Detailed Description: please refer to information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.

...

HPA Pluggable in Multicloud

...

Leveraging HPA in IPsec use case: From VNF to CNF

  • Short Description:  This session will introduce the implementation of the IPsec use case with the advantages get from HPA inside VNF and its current plan to convert to CNF.

  • Detailed Description: With the help of HPA, one can implement the IPsec use case with better performance. Also in Frankfurt, we are planning to convert the use case to a containerized one based on the HPA extension to Kubernetes, to better accommodate various environments. Details can be found in https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/MulticloudvIPsec+use+HPAcase+Discoverywith+PluggableHPA.
  • Topic Leader: Haibin Huang  ruoyu.ying
  • Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): 15-30Special Consideration: Tuesday, January 14, 2020
  • Interested In Attending:Anyone who're interested in HPA and Multicloud.

Leveraging HPA in IPsec use case: From VNF to CNF

  • Short Description:  This session will introduce the implementation of the IPsec use case with the advantages get from HPA inside VNF and its current plan to convert to CNF If you are interested in discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.

...

Development Experience Sharing of PNF Software Upgrade Use Case

  • Short Description:  Sharing the experiences and lessons learnt in developing PNF software upgrade use case.
  • Detailed Description: With the help of HPA, one can implement the IPsec use case with better performance. Also in Frankfurt, we are planning to convert the use case to a containerized one based on the HPA extension to Kubernetes, to better accommodate various environments. Details can be found in https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/vIPsec+use+case+with+HPASharing the experiences and lessons in designing and implementing LCM APIs of SDNC, Ansible Playbooks, EMS emulator and some others when developing PNF software upgrade use case.
  • Topic Leader:  ruoyu.yingEnbo Wang
  • Estimated Audience Size Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): 1-15-30
  • Interested In AttendingIf you are interested in discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.

...

5G NRM Configuration with Restful protocol

  • Short DescriptionSharing the experiences and lessons learnt in developing PNF software upgrade use caseOngoing work on 5G NRM Configuration use case using SO and CDS.
  • Detailed Description: Sharing the experiences and lessons in designing and implementing LCM APIs of SDNC, Ansible Playbooks, EMS emulator and some others when developing PNF software upgrade use case Network resources are the fundamental resources to the mobility networks. This session will present the results of 5G NRM Configuation use case started from Frankfurt, and also introduce the experience, lessons and disscussion of next steps.
  • Topic Leader: Enbo Wang wangyaoguang
  • Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): 1-15
  • Interested In AttendingIf you are interested in discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.
  • Lukasz Rajewski

5G NRM Configuration with Restful protocol

...

ONAP Project Lifecycle & Reviews

  • Short Description:  Review proposed enhancements to the ONAP project lifecycle reviews
  • Detailed Description: ONAP currently has a full project lifecycle consisting of states: proposed, incubation, mature, core, and archived.  However, all current projects are in the incubation state as neither the projects nor the TSCs have used the documented review process to move projects into other states.  This session will review the current states & review process.  It will make suggestions on enhancements to the review criteria as well as encourage projects to submit themselves for review.  The goal is that ONAP adopters and supporters can see which projects are considered core and mature.
  • Topic Leaderdjhunt Chaker Al-Hakim
  • Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): 115-1530
  • Interested In Attending:   If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.

      ...

      ...

      ONAP Release Cadence Proposal

      • Short Description:  Review proposed enhancements to the ONAP project lifecycle reviews Review the Release Cadence Task Force Proposal for Future ONAP Releases
      • Detailed Description: ONAP ONAP currently has a full project lifecycle consisting of states: proposed, incubation, mature, core, and archived.  However, all current projects are in the incubation state as neither the projects nor the TSCs have used the documented review process to move projects into other states.  This session will review the current states & review process.  It will make suggestions on enhancements to the review criteria as well as encourage projects to submit themselves for review.  The goal is that ONAP adopters and supporters can see which projects are considered core and mature.
      • Topic Leaderdjhunt Chaker Al-Hakim
      • Estimated Audience Size 3 Releases per year that follow a predefined timeline for completing each release Milestone. As the ONAP Platform moves from the incubation state to a Mature state, it is important to revisit the release Cadence and propose some improvements to the release process to meet the demands for faster delivery of features/functionalities and for proper resource allocation
      • Topic Leader: Chaker Al-Hakim  Liam Fallon Krzysztof Opasiak
      • Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): 15-30
      • Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.

      ...

      ...

      Policy Framework Frankfurt Improvements

      • Short Description: Review the Release Cadence Task Force Proposal for Future ONAP Releases
      • Detailed Description: ONAP currently has 3 Releases per year that follow a predefined timeline for completing each release Milestone. As the ONAP Platform moves from the incubation state to a Mature state, it is important to revisit the release Cadence and propose some improvements to the release process to meet the demands for faster delivery of features/functionalities and for proper resource allocation
      • Topic Leader: Chaker Al-Hakim  Liam Fallon Krzysztof Opasiak: Explain and demonstrate the improvements in the ONAP policy Framework being developed in Frankfurt
      • Detailed Description:  A number of improvements and enhancements such as better handling of PDPs, better TOSCA support, support for Self Service Control loops, and better monitoring and observability are being developed in the ONAP Policy Framework in Frankfurt. In this  session, we will describe the improvements and demonstrate early versions of enhanced functionality.
      • Topic Leader: Pamela Dragosh Liam Fallon Other Policy Framework project members.
      • Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): 15-30
      • Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.
      • cl664y@att.com
      • Morgan Richomme

      Policy Framework Frankfurt Improvements

      ...

      Modeling subcommittee

      • Short Description: Explain and demonstrate the improvements in the ONAP policy Framework being developed in Frankfurt
      • Detailed Description:  A number of improvements and enhancements such as better handling of PDPs, better TOSCA support, support for Self Service Control loops, and better monitoring and observability are being developed in the ONAP Policy Framework in Frankfurt. In this  session, we will describe the improvements and demonstrate early versions of enhanced functionality.
      • Topic Leader: Pamela Dragosh Liam Fallon Other Policy Framework project members. Model of ONAP will be finalized before M3, many models need to be finalized
      • Detailed Description:  There are many models proposed for Frankfurt which need to be finalized. Slicing model et al.
      • Topic Leader: Andy Mayer Hui Deng
      • Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): 15-30
      • Interested In Attending: If  If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.

      ...

      SO – deploying custom BPMN workflows (with code) in run-time

      • Short Description: Model of ONAP will be finalized before M3, many models need to be finalized
      • Detailed Description:  There are many models proposed for Frankfurt which need to be finalized. Slicing model et al.
      • Topic Leader: Andy Mayer Hui Deng
      • Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): 15-30
      • Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.

      SO – deploying custom BPMN workflows (with code) in run-time

      • Short Description: Demo of a PoC that shows how we could deploy custom workflow applications (BPMN + Java, or even Groovy (wink)) on running ONAP instance.
      • Detailed Description:  
        • On the presentation we will show how we reorganized SO deployment so it's easy to create and deploy custom workflow applications. These are WAR-based applications that encapsulate both new BPMNs and Java/Groovy code. 
        • We will deploy custom application in run-time without a need to restart any of the ONAP components.
        • No changes to SO code or image will be needed. 
        • Both new BPMNs and code will be immediately available for use via SO APIs. 
        • As a demo to ensure that our deployment works, we will show service instantiation which uses newly added Building Block.
      • Topic Leader: Lukasz GrechDemo of a PoC that shows how we could deploy custom workflow applications (BPMN + Java, or even Groovy (wink)) on running ONAP instance.
      • Detailed Description:  
        • On the presentation we will show how we reorganized SO deployment so it's easy to create and deploy custom workflow applications. These are WAR-based applications that encapsulate both new BPMNs and Java/Groovy code. 
        • We will deploy custom application in run-time without a need to restart any of the ONAP components.
        • No changes to SO code or image will be needed. 
        • Both new BPMNs and code will be immediately available for use via SO APIs. 
        • As a demo to ensure that our deployment works, we will show service instantiation which uses newly added Building Block.
      • Topic Leader: Lukasz Grech
      • Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): <30
      • Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.

      ...

      OOM - What's new?

      • Short Description: Last update on OOM new features
      • Detailed Description:  
        • Work on the storage classes
        • Work on the databases, harmonization of the charts and use of common Databases
        • Keep ONAP resources under control (Reduce CPU and Memory requests from components)
        • Security features
      • Topic Leader: Sylvain Desbureaux
      • Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): <30
      • Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.Lukasz Rajewski

      ...

      OOM -

      ...

      Introduction of Service mesh

      • Short Description: Last update on OOM new featuresIntroduction of service mesh in OOM
      • Detailed Description:  
        • Work on the storage classes
        • Work on the databases, harmonization of the charts and use of common Databases
        • Keep ONAP resources under control (Reduce CPU and Memory requests from components)
        • Security features
        • What is service Mesh
        • Advantages/drawbacks overview
        • Feedback on PoC done on ONAP
        • Demo
        • Plan for Frankfurt and Guilin
      • Topic Leader: Sylvain Desbureaux
      • Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): <30
      • Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.

      OOM - Introduction of Service mesh

      • Short Description: Introduction of service mesh in OOM
      • Detailed Description:  
      • What is service Mesh
      • Advantages/drawbacks overview
      • Feedback on PoC done on ONAP
      • Demo
      • Plan for Frankfurt and Guilinthe schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.

      ...

      Test - Introduction to ONAP python SDK

      • Short Description: Presentation of the ONAP SDK python module
      • Detailed Description: A deep refactoring of the onap-tests solution used to performed end to end tests in gating on Daily chains has been initiated to provide a python SDK (https://gitlab.com/Orange-OpenSource/lfn/onap/python-onapsdk) with high quality expectation (pylint 10, coverage 100%, unit + functional tests, auto generated docs).

        This SDK is a client library written in Python for building applications to work with ONAP. The project aims to provide a consistent and complete set of interactions with ONAP’s many services, along with complete documentation, examples, and tools. Using few python commands, you should be able to onboard, distribute models and instantiate xNFs.

           
      • Topic Leader: Sylvain Desbureaux Morgan Richomme
      • Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): <30
      • Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.

      ...

      Integration - Gating retrospective

      • Short Description: Presentation of the ONAP SDK python moduleFeedback on ONAP gating
      • Detailed Description: A deep refactoring of the onap-tests solution used to performed end to end tests in gating on Daily chains has been initiated to provide a python SDK (https://gitlab.com/Orange-OpenSource/lfn/onap/python-onapsdk) with high quality expectation (pylint 10, coverage 100%, unit + functional tests, auto generated docs).

        This SDK is a client library written in Python for building applications to work with ONAP. The project aims to provide a consistent and complete set of interactions with ONAP’s many services, along with complete documentation, examples, and tools. Using few python commands, you should be able to onboard, distribute models and instantiate xNFs.

            ONAP gating has been introduced in February in order to provide a quick feedback on any OOM new patchset. Since February, the mechanism has been improved and extended to other projects (SO) and other infrastructure (Azure). This session will come back on the different evolutions, provide feedback on the Azure offloading and discuss the possiblity to extend this gating to new components (proposal done to A&AI team) to perform CSIT tests on target infrastructure  
      • Topic Leader: Sylvain Desbureaux Morgan Richomme
      • Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): <30
      • Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.Lukasz Rajewski

      ...

      Integration -

      ...

      Performance and Robustness tests for future releases

      • Short Description: Open discussion on performance and robustness tests
      • Detailed Description: For the moment, most of the tests are functional tests. There is no real stress or performance test. There is 1 72h long duration test (stability test executed by integration team consistsing in runningvFW use case during 72h). These tests are usually complex to setup and requires resources. This session will question the sense of such tests within ONAP context and evaluate some scenarios. 
      • Topic Leader: Morgan Richomme
      • Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): <301-15
      • Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.

      ...

      Integration -

      ...

      Discussion on the test strategy evolution in ONAP

      • Short Description: Open discussion on performance and robustness tests
      • Detailed Description: For the moment, most of the tests are functional tests. There is no real stress or performance test. There is 1 72h long duration test (stability test executed by integration team consistsing in runningvFW use case during 72h). These tests are usually complex to setup and requires resources. This session will question the sense of such tests within ONAP context and evaluate some scenarios. 
      • Topic Leader: Morgan Richomme
      • Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): 1-15
      • Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.

      Integration - Discussion on the test strategy evolution in ONAP

      • Short Description: Discussion on the test strategy evolution in ONAP based on Integration team experience.
      • Detailed Description: Very ambitious test had been announced in the past (S3P, chaos monkey). However health check still does not guarantee a good integration, verified end to end use cases are sometimes very big and hard to automate and/or to reproduce in different environments.  It is today not trivial to know which components are really used/covered through existing use cases. Basic Integration tests in the target environment are missing to guarantee a good quality of the solution.

        More basic tests should be provided by the components to offer a better coverage of their APIs, interfaces and features. CSIT tests are not enough as they are run on non representative target environment and robot healthcheck tests are sometimes to high level to re

      • ally indicate the health of a component. This session will address the question of the test strategy in ONAP.

      • Topic Leader: Morgan Richomme Krzysztof Kuzmicki Marcin Przybysz Discussion on the test strategy evolution in ONAP based on Integration team experience.
      • Detailed Description: Very ambitious test had been announced in the past (S3P, chaos monkey). However health check still does not guarantee a good integration, verified end to end use cases are sometimes very big and hard to automate and/or to reproduce in different environments.  It is today not trivial to know which components are really used/covered through existing use cases. Basic Integration tests in the target environment are missing to guarantee a good quality of the solution.

        More basic tests should be provided by the components to offer a better coverage of their APIs, interfaces and features. CSIT tests are not enough as they are run on non representative target environment and robot healthcheck tests are sometimes to high level to re

      • ally indicate the health of a component. This session will address the question of the test strategy in ONAP.

      • Topic Leader: Morgan Richomme Krzysztof Kuzmicki Marcin Przybysz
      • Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): 1-15
      • Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.

      ...

      ONAP Usability - Current status and Frankfurt objectives

      • Short Description: ONAP usability on going efforts
      • Detailed Description:  ONAP usability is a key challenge to help ONAP adoption. Many efforts have been in El ALto in Documentation project with new User Guides and within Policy and SDC to bring a commun portal to design services. However, there is still a lot of challenges to address to help ONAP user to start their journey with ONAP. This session presents some current challenges and on-going activities (Documentation, SDC, CDS UI, Policy...)
      • Topic Leader Eric Debeau Andreas Geißler
      • Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): 1-15< 30
      • Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.

      ...

      5G Transport Slicing: How to evolve CCVPN to a multi-layer slicing and abstraction solution

      • Short Description:

        ONAP usability on going efforts

          Share and discuss design ideas on how to add to CCVPN the multi-layer slicing and network abstraction capability, which can enable 5G transport slicing

      • Detailed Description ONAP usability is a key challenge to help ONAP adoption. Many efforts have been in El ALto in Documentation project with new User Guides and within Policy and SDC to bring a commun portal to design services. However, there is still a lot of challenges to address to help ONAP user to start their journey with ONAP. This session presents some current challenges and on-going activities (Documentation, SDC, CDS UI, Policy...)
      • Topic Leader Eric Debeau Andreas Geißler
      • Estimated Audience Size This topic discusses (1) how to evolve/extend the current CCVPN use case into a multi-layer/technology slicing architecture which provides abstraction management across layers; (2) how to carry out a transport network slicing solution based on the new architecture; (3) how the solution can be integrated with other ONAP components/solutions to support the overall E2E 5G slicing use case; and (4) how ONAP can work together with standards organizations (ETSI, IETF, MEF, etc.) on coordinating aspects of standards relevant to multi-layer/technology transport slicing functionality and operations in 5G contexts.
      • Topic LeaderLIN MENG Henry Yu
      • Estimated Audience Size (1-15 / 15-30 / 30-50 / >50): < 15-30

      Interested In Attending: If you are interested in this discussion and would like to participate in it, please add your name and email here (one name/email per line please). We'll use this information when building the schedule so that we minimize overbooking people where possible.

      ...