...
| Member | Representing | Member | Representing | Member | Representing | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ODIM (sandbox) | Cisco | Samsung | ||||||
@Anil Guntupalli | Verizon | IBM | ODL (TAC) | |||||
| Juniper | Huawei | Szymon Golebiewski | TF (incubation) | |||||
| AT&T | China Mobile | Intel | ||||||
cl664y@att.com proxy Timo Perala | ONAP (TAC) | Deutsche Telekom | Red Hat | |||||
| ZTE | TBD | Walmart | Anuket (TAC) | |||||
| Ericsson | Orange | China Telecom | ||||||
| Tech Mahindra | Nokia | XGVela (sandbox) | ||||||
| FD.io (TAC) | TBD | EMCO (sandbox) | ||||||
TBD | Amdocs |
LF Staff: Casey Cain, Kenny Paul, Sandra Jackson (Deactivated) Brandon Wick Sandra Jackson (Deactivated), LJ Illuzzi Heather Kirksey
Others: Tina Tsou (Deactivated)
Agenda
- Start the Recording
- We will start by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.
- Roll Call
- Action Items Review
- Agenda Bashing
- General Topics
- Welcoming Nick Davey representing Juniper
- PNDA
- Evolving project health reviews - djhunt
- Updates
- Developer and Testing Forum
- June in-person event
- Credly badging
- Any Other Topics
Minutes
PNDA
- Overall participation and contribution has declined. Looking to see if anyone might be using PNDA.
- Frank Brockners mentioned that Cisco had done some initial showcase of PNDA with DCAE but it has not been maintained.
- Similar participation issues with SNAS.
- LFX Dashboard is misleading in displaying cumulative stats that look like recent stats.
- Cumulative stats are not affected by time period selection
- mash-up of cumulative stats mixed with time period is not clear to the viewer
- A screen shot taken of one stat can easily give the impression that a project is healthy when it isn't
- Suggestion for adding an email subscription for a monthly health stats update
- Request for Insights feedback session at a future TAC meeting
Project Health Reviews
- Issue that project teams are not participating in project health reviews
- Required reviews are quarterly for sandbox, and annual for incubation.
- Issues with project health (see above) could be caught if reviews held regularly, but how to encourage projects to participate?
- Would like to encourage projects to participate in webinar creation (similar to what ONAP has been doing)
Topic 1
- Comments
Topic 2
- Comments
Action items
- Option to get rid of the review template & just have a scheduled review (no preparation necessary) where pull up LFX data directly & have informal discussion
- Will have small team review and make recommendations
Developer & Testing Forum
- January 10-13th, 2022
- Topic Proposals
- Topics Due by
- Registration (Required but free)
June in-person event
- Heather Kirksey mentioned that there are possible conflicts with Open Infra and Broadband forum.
- We need to decide what week makes the most sense for the LFN community.
Credly Badging
- Badging Template has been updated; needs review from one or more TAC members; will send email to mailing list
Action items
- Kenny Paul follow up with LFX Insights team with relevant issues mentioned above and get a feedback session on the TAC at meeting