Page Comparison

...

Attendees

LF staff: Jim Baker @jill lovato  Jill Lovato  Heather Kirksey David McBride Kenny Paul

EUAG: Atul Purohit Saad Ullah Sheikh FREEMAN, BRIAN D Marc-Alexandre Choquette @javier Ger Randy Levensalor 

Guests: Javier Ger  Scott Blandford

Agenda

• Start the Recording
• Antitrust Policy
• Agenda Bashing (Roll Call, Action Items (5 minutes)
• EUAG chair elections Jim Baker
• DDF results review, action items and next steps Atul Purohit
• LFN MAC positioning statement - Q&A (previously distributed via email) Heather Kirksey  
• L0/L1 Optical Networks Carrier Interconnection – scope : ONAP/CCVPN and ODL/Transport-pce” FREEMAN, BRIAN D Olivier Augizeau

Minutes

• EUAG chair electionsLFN MAC positioning statement
  • DDF results review
  • • Atul Purohit nominated and was unoppoosed - Congratulations Atul our new EUAG chair!
  • DDF results review Atul Purohit
    • Review of the DDF discussions 
    • See demo page
    • Atul to look at options to track action items - AI on the minutes OR using EUAG jira
  • LFN MAC positioning statement Heather Kirksey Jill Lovato
    • Pointer from Email send by Brandon Wick 
    • Messaging is LFN wide - not project specific
    • Questions:
      • ONAP is not a standard - rather it's based on ETSI/GSMA/etc. - is there some documentation of the relationship between the projects and the SDOs?
        • ONAP has specific liaisons but not a centralized source of LFN SDO engagements - readouts are given at TSC meetings from time to time
      • There is some written agreement with ETSI, can you describe this?
        • ONAP is broader than ETSI - but don't know the scope of the agreement
        • With ETSI there is an agreement of ONAP subset implemented 
        • AI - provide the ETSI/ONAP agreement Jim Baker
      • The value to service providers having a service that works with existing OAM (interop AND operationally compatible) 
        • Both a reduction of effort and clarity of responsibility/reduced TTM
        • Telcos VS over-the-top players rate of change is very high - LFN helps this competitive pace
        • Consistent architecture is another benefit - SDOs do not help get consistent implementation - just consensus 
      • Seems a little ONAP centric - are there other project related proof points?
        • Perhaps a case study may be more appropriate?
          • Go direct to the ODL technical community - Contact Casey Cain
  • L0/L1 Optical Networks Carrier Interconnection – scope : ONAP/CCVPN and ODL/Transport-pce

  Action items

  • -pce FREEMAN, BRIAN D
    • Presentation intention - share activities and seek engagement
    • @Javier - Fragmentation between LFN projects and SDOs
      • connection between ONAP and BSS is poorly defined - is there an effort to standardize?
      • FREEMAN, BRIAN D more work needed,  MEF & TMF discussions are necessary to understand the different approaches
      • Calls are Wednesdays @ 8AM Eastern https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Meeting+Minutes+-+Optical+Usecase - Contact Denise Provencher for invite (denise.provencher@us.fujitsu.com)
        
    • slides presented during the call

  View file
  name EUAG L1 Interconnect PoC 19-07-02.pptx height 250

  
  

  Action items

  •  Heather Kirksey Jim Baker Compile a list of SDO engagements and ecosystem relationships 16 Jul 2019 
  •  FREEMAN, BRIAN D attach slides to wiki minutes and info for the Multi-domain Optical Network Services meeting times  02 Jul 2019