Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

X = Present | P = Proxy  (Indicate in the table with @name for @name

IBM
MemberRepresenting
MemberRepresenting
MemberRepresenting
ODIM (sandbox)
CiscoSamsung

@Anil Guntupalli 

Verizon

FD.io (TAC)
ODL (TAC)
Nick DaveyHuawei

@Anil Guntupalli 

Juniper
Verizon
Cisco
 

TF (incubation)
EMCO (sandbox)

IBM


Red Hat
AT&T
China MobileTimothy Verrall (Deactivated) Red Hat

Huawei

Intel


ONAP (TAC)
China Mobile
Anuket (TAC)
Orange
Deutsche Telekom

China Telecom
ZTE
TBDAnuket (TAC

Walmart
Juniper
XGVela (sandbox)
Ericsson
Morgan Richomme

Orange
Nokia
Xiaojun Xie

TBD

China Telecom
Walmart
Tech Mahindra
NokiaXGVela (sandbox)Ed Warnicke
FD.io (TAC)

Google
EMCO (sandbox)

TBD

Amdocs













LF Staff:Others: Casey Cain Kenny Paul Sandra Jackson (Deactivated) LJ Illuzzi David McBride  Brandon Wick

Community: Ed WarnickeLincoln Lavoie Timo Perala

Agenda

  • Start the Recording
  • We will start by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.
  • Roll Call
  • Action Items Review
  • Agenda Bashing
  • General Topics
  • Any Other Topics

Minutes

Topic 1

  • Comments

Topic 2

...

Events

TAC Structure

  • TAC discussed the structure of the committee and how it compares to other LF TOC/TAC structures.
  • Discussion of CNCF's model - noted that the CNCF board is much is more engaged/active than the LFN GB.
  • Dave Wallace suggested that projects need to demonstrate activity in the TAC to move from Incubation to Graduated- if they are not attending the TAC meeting there is obviously little interest in progressing.
    • Concerns were raised about incubation projects may not be mature enough to have a voting rep
    • There was a suggestion to formalize the non-voting members

Action items

  •