/
2022-03-23 TAC Minutes

2022-03-23 TAC Minutes

Attendees & Representation (default sort: member first name)

TAC Members and Project representatives should mark their attendance below 
Non-TAC project reps do not count towards meeting quorum

X = Present | P = Proxy  (Indicate in the table with @name for @name

Member

Representing



Member

Representing



Member

Representing



Member

Representing



Member

Representing



Member

Representing



@Alex Vul (Deactivated)

ODIM (sandbox)



@Dave Wallace

FD.io (TAC)



@Robert Varga

ODL (TAC)



@Anil Guntupalli 

Verizon



@Frank Brockners 

Cisco



@Szymon Golebiewski

TF (incubation)



@Amar Kapadia

EMCO (sandbox)



@djhunt 

IBM



@Stephen Flaherty

Red Hat



@FREEMAN, BRIAN D

AT&T



@Kalyankumar Asangi

Huawei



@Srinivasa Addepalli

Intel



@cl664y@att.com

(Proxy: @Timo Perala)

ONAP (TAC)



@Lingli Deng 

China Mobile



@Gergely Csatari

Anuket (TAC)



@Cédric Ollivier

Orange



@Marc Fiedler 

Deutsche Telekom



@Xiaojun Xie

China Telecom



@ChangJin Wang

ZTE



@Nick Davey

Juniper



@Qihui Zhao

XGVela (sandbox)



@Christian Olrog Atlassian

Ericsson



@Olaf Renner

Nokia



TBD

Walmart



@Dhananjay Pavgi 

Tech Mahindra



@Ramesh Nagarajan

Google



























LF Staff: @Casey Cain @Kenny Paul @Sandra Jackson (Deactivated) @LJ Illuzzi @David McBride  @Brandon Wick

Community: @Ed Warnicke@Lincoln Lavoie @Timo Perala

Agenda

  • Start the Recording

  • We will start by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.

  • Roll Call

  • Action Items Review

  • Agenda Bashing

  • General Topics

  • Any Other Topics

Minutes

Events

TAC Structure

  • TAC discussed the structure of the committee and how it compares to other LF TOC/TAC structures.

  • Discussion of CNCF's model - noted that the CNCF board is much is more engaged/active than the LFN GB.

  • @Dave Wallace suggested that projects need to demonstrate activity in the TAC to move from Incubation to Graduated- if they are not attending the TAC meeting there is obviously little interest in progressing.

    • Concerns were raised about incubation projects may not be mature enough to have a voting rep

    • There was a suggestion to formalize the non-voting members

Action items