Page Comparison

...

Start the Recording
We will start by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.
- Antitrust Policy
Roll Call
Action Items Review
Agenda Bashing
General Topics
- Developer Survey Update - Casey Cain Kenny Paul
- Recurring Updates
  - Whitepapers - Ranny Haiby
  - LFN Security Forum - Ranny Haiby
  - TAC Community Schedule - djhunt Ranny Haiby
- LF IT Services Feedback - Morgan RichommeLFN Recognition Program - draft badging criteria - djhunt TAC_30_06.pdf
- Next Developer Event - Heather Kirksey
  - In-person/virtual/hybrid
  - Timing
- LFN Recognition Program - draft badging criteria - djhunt
Any Other Topics

Minutes

Al Morton introduced Walter.kozlowski and informed the TAC that he would be representing the Anuket community going forward.

57 respondents out of the 350ish registered attendees
Request that the community leadership encourage participation in the survey <ADD LINK HERE> LFN Operational Survey
2020 survey had 87 responses, so YoY we are down in response rates
Ed Warnicke LFN Operational Survey (deadline May 7)? Yes. FD.io community does not respond to an email request
- LFN to send request to community leaders and asking them to perform the reachout to the respective communities
Frank Brockners Is there a way to add an incentive? Swag give away?
- International shipping is beyond affordable - perhaps other digital awards are possible (store credit, event passes, etc.)

White papers
- End to End slicing white paper is moving ahead - planning for broader review 7/14
- 5G SBP white paper stalled
Security Forum
- Joining a mailing list for security topics - wiki signup page created for lfn-securitywg

- and mailing list lfn-securitywg@lists.lfnetworking.org
Cross community engagement
- TF working on establishing priorities based on community feedback Ranny Haiby
- xgvela meeting was useful to better understand the community djhunt

Objective: Improve relations between communities and LF IT
Some structural problems remain
ONAP Jenkins downtime reviewed
- Each outage resulted in a close of a LF IT ticket and a re-open of the ticket on failure
Community members are not given credentials/authorization to self-manage the tools
Community does not review the code from LF IT
- Has introduced regressions
System upgrades
- Deferred updates cause longer outages for community developers
No full 24x7 support from LF IT - full community support could address this
Proposed changes
- Share credentials with communities via TSCs
- More time zone support
- Open source alternatives for all LF IT services
Discussion
- Ed Warnicke Don't use LF IT as primary provider. CNCF does not provide tool chains for projects
- djhunt Clearly ties into the Operations Survey - this requires more discussions
- Heather Kirksey These issues underscore the reasons of LF IT engaging tool chains like gitlab
View file
name TAC_30_06.pdf
height 150