Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

20191031 - [CNTT - GOV] - Agenda & Meeting Minutes

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 55 Next »


Materials:

CNTT_Weekly_Goverance - Final (FIX input 30Oct2019).pptx

CNTT_Status_2019-10-30_Technology Status & Update.pdf

Attendees:


Topics:

  • Walk-On Items
  • Housekeeping

  • GSMA & LFN Updates

    • (Jisu & Heather)
  • Governance Workstreams

    • Release & Lifecycle Management - we are still light here, looking for additional to help lead and contribute  (Jonathan)

  • Technology Status (Walter + WSLs)

    • Snezka Release - High-Level Roadmap (Rabi - Next Week)

    • RM

    • RA1

    • RA2

    • RI1

    • RC1

  • CNTT - CNCF TUG F2F Planning (Gerg0)
  • Prague F2F Planning (Rick, Jim, Jonathan)
    • Beginning to develop plans, the venue is fairly large and will likely be able to have breakouts as needed
    • Hack Sessions Overview from Jim

Notes:

  • Walk-On Items
  • GSMA & LFN
  • Governance Workstreams
    • Need Release & Lifecycle Management because it is lightly participated in right now. speedwyre and Toshi Wakayama are co-leads. Would welcome a Lead.
  • Technology Status 
    • RM - updates needed from Rabi Abdel and victor gao
    • RA1 - issues have been assigned but not fully reflected in the preso
    • RA2 - a lot of good work here, mainly addressing architectural requirements right now which are priority and coming along well
      • Not much happening with Dev upstream yet
    • RI1 - How to leverage documentation for different implementations and architectures have specific lifecycle components (OpenStack)
    • RI1 have had a deployment (using Airship). A lot of develop activities are happening right now. 
    • RI1 New name for CNTT-RI project is CIRV
      •  "OPNFV project renamed from CNTT-RI to Common Infrastructure Realization & Validation (CIRV)". No change in output, goals, or objectives, just a rename to a) avoid confusion w/ the RI workstream, and b) also position OPNFV long term for RI/RC deliveries.
    • Intel and other partners planning performance evaluations for network and compute intensive profiles–and working on roadmap items
    • Walter suggests walk thru/demo of lab deployment
    • Have Fu Qiao / Mike give a deep dive preso of RI and RC
    • AI - Qiao Fu Michael Fix let governance know when ready to give healthy update on RI and RC and we'll schedule extended time box during governance call
      • What have you done? Where are you going? What have you learned?
  • AI - speedwyre Send out CNCF TUG link to list services to attend KubeCon NA 2019 and link to Brainstorming agenda items
  • Summer 2020 is message for when CNTT is targeting ready to certify VNFs 
    • RA2 has potential to radically change CNCF approach
  • Prague F2F Planning
    • Registration link is up for Prague F2F Planning
    • Hack session traditionally held and sponsored by OPNFV. OPNFV call the "Plugfest". Remote access to equipment/systems
    • Gather technical experts to work through issues.
    • VNF hacking session being put together by Lincoln Lavoie to go thru OVP program and gain badging. Program continues on. Telcos should encourage Partners to show up and start 
      • What would be the intent to make it meaningful, goals, intents, etc.?
      • Smaller carriers will be looking to folks like SUSE, etc. and other partners might come in and produce their own 
        • To get touch / feel on a commercial. (see link in minutes for example of hacking track).
      • Could RI / RC have a commercially viable RA 1 ready for Prague?
      • See link to the currently planned session above.
      • Really focused on VNF vendor outreach.
      • AI Rick Tennant  F2F Planning team needs to have specific use cases.
      • Oppty is for CNTT to create it's own track for similar purposes.
      • Really have a good understanding of what the outcome should be.  Should it be a piece of test code?  A prototype certification process? Who drives it?  I think combination of the the operators and the vendor partners.
      • Questions is will RI and RC have enough depth to take advantage of it to build e.g. RA1. Will we be far enough along?
      • CNTT effort should build upon OVP/
      • Per Jim Baker - One focus can be to for CNTT to add additional qualification testing as a 'beta'
  • Nick Chase (Marketing and Comms WSL) - if have events that have significant technical impacts please let Nick Chase know. Tracking down folks on who mentioned Airship and StarlingX.



  • No labels