This chart serves as a high level RACI to ensure OPNFV and CNTT teams are working within their scope and boundaries. This is meant to be a high level chart to reach consensus, and promote open dialog regarding lower level responsibilities based on accepted boundaries.
Stakeholders Identified in the RACI are:
- LFN
- GSMA
- OPNFV
- CNTT
| Deliverable/Boundary | Responsible (Does actual work) | Accountable (Owns the end product) | Consulted (May use output, has input) | Informed (Uses Output, agnostic to input | Agreement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference Model | ||||||
| - RM Development/Updates | CNTT | CNTT, GSMA | OPNFV | LFN | ||
| "1" Stream | ||||||
| - RA-1 Requirements Development/Updates | CNTT | CNTT | OPNFV | GSMA, LFN | ||
| - RI-1 Requirements Development/Updates | CNTT | CNTT | OPNFV | GSMA, LFN | ||
| - RI-1 Implementation (Cookbook), Integration, Operations | OPNFV | OPNFV | CNTT | GSMA, LFN | ||
| - RC-1 Requirements Development/Updates | CNTT | CNTT | OPNFV | GSMA, LFN | ||
| - RC-1 Implementation (Cookbook), Integration, Operations | OPNFV | OPNFV | CNTT | GSMA, LFN | ||
| - Traceability Matrix | CNTT | CNTT | OPNFV | GSMA, LFN | ||
| "2" Stream (TBD) → we need to see how successful "1" arrangement is. → no need to rush in thinking about "2" and we still didn't figure out "1". I STRONGLY SUGGEST NOT TO RUSH INTO THIS WITHOUT FIGURE OUT "1" AND PROVE MODEL WORKS. | ||||||
| - RA-2 Requirements Development/Updates | CNTT | CNTT | OPNFV | GSMA, LFN | ||
| - RI-2 Requirements Development/Updates | CNTT | CNTT | OPNFV | GSMA, LFN | ||
| - RI-2 Implementation (Cookbook), Integration, Operations | TBD | TBD | GSMA, LFN | |||
| - RC-2 Requirements Development/Updates | CNTT | CNTT | CNTT | GSMA, LFN | ||
| - RC-2 Implementation (Cookbook), Integration, Operations | TBD | TBD | GSMA, LFN | |||
| - Traceability Matrix | CNTT | CNTT | OPNFV | GSMA, LFN | ||
| Cook Books | ||||||
| - Installer | OPNFV | OPNFV | CNTT | GSMA, LFN | ||
| - Lab | OPNFV | OPNFV | CNTT | GSMA, LFN | ||
| - Test | OPNFV | OPNFV | CNTT | GSMA, LFN |
Questions need to be answered:
- What happens when CNTT develop a requirement in, say, RI-1?
- do CNTT goes directly to prospective OPNFV project and get it implemented (via that project PTL).
- how are those implementation will link back to CNTT releases?
- Will each project has their own release cycle (with appropriate baggings) or will OPNFV has an overall release cadence ? how does the model work?
- or will CNTT has to follow some kind of process to get their requirements implemented?
- or will OPNFV itself regularly get CNTT releases and find the right OPNFV projects to implement any new requirements.
- via CIRV?
- what is the role of OPNFV TSC on all this? who is accountable for what?
- we need to talk about accountability and make it clear who is accountable for what!
- do CNTT goes directly to prospective OPNFV project and get it implemented (via that project PTL).
- How does OVP fit into this matrix?
- Given the GSMA process is it mostly a consumer and ratifier of the output from CNTT, or does it have a role in providing feedback? I.e. how can this be set up to be a two way street?