Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

2020-02-18 [CNTT - GSC] - Agenda & Meeting Minutes

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 23 Next »

Materials:

Attendees:

Topics:

Notes:

  • Walk On Items
  • Governance – Baldy Priority Items
    • F2F Planning - Governance Topic Solicitation (Brian Bearden, Rick Tennant, Scot Steele)
      • AI - Add Session for Whitepaper
      • AI - Increase time for MMA to 120 mins
      • Possibly will not do plenary session with LFN, but can still do a CNTT-only plenary.
      • Optional - have an introduction/newbie onboarding session depending on how many folks need it. In a parallel session.
      • There is additional meeting space, tables, (atrium like) places to sit in open area–bring printouts.
  • Baldy Priority Items without owners
    • "Goal" Outline/define of what is needed in initial Field Trials from RC1/OVP #1100 - Brian Bearden
      • What is overall scope and requirements for Field Trial (Business perspective)
      • Who do we secure to do it
      • Define MVP Support model
      • Couple Operators 
        • Verizon is ready to do this.
      • Couple NFVI Vendors with labs
        • P1 - NFVI Vendor stand up an RI, then We/They would run RC1 against it
        • P2 - NFV Vendor
      • Make these into requirements
        • Secure lab participation/capacity/diversity for initial Field Trials #1101
        • Define MVP support model / structure for trials #1102 (move into 1100)
          • How to help standing up with cookbook etc.
        • Confirm trial participants and SPOCs #1103
        • Define trial expectations, what's needed, roles & responsibilities  #1104
          • Types of resources needed to pull this off.
          • Overall project management
          • Vendor contacts
          • SME for RC1
          • SME for RI1
          • RC1 running against RI1 is what is needed from OPNFV - need OPNFV lead
        • Trial Kickoff Meetings #110
          • Project plan with major milestones
          • Detail on what is expected (Nick can assist in ensuring expectations are met)
            • R1 stoop up in community lab, run RC1 against (what made sense? what didn't make sense? did the conformance suite work to test it?) kinda like a smoke test on CNTT community infra
            • RI1 stood up in Vendor lab, run RC1 against their own infra and give feedback (what made sense? what didn't make sense? did the conformance suite work to test it?)
            • VNF Vendor could come a try to stand up against both
        • Key Concern: Vendors concerned about optics. Needs to be a partnership with community to ensure what happens to results, who will have access to results, etc. Publishing rights. Etc. Provide a badge, so community would publish who owned the badge but not show necessarily what was passed. E.g. 85% passed = allotment of badge but not show results to all. 
      • Need to validate RI and RC suite makes sense.
      • Action - Need to clarify with vendors what we will share and what won't be shared as they are concerned about sharing the results.
        • They could run RC1 themselves and give us feedback on their results.
        • When results announced "Successfully implemented on RI, RC test passed, we used XYZ vendor, and passed it.
      • OPNFV current badge link: https://nfvi-verified.lfnetworking.org/#/

Appendix:

  • No labels