Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 2
Next »
Materials:
Topics/Notes:
- Anti-Trust Policies:
- Status on proposals 10 min
- CNTT as a formal LFN project
- CNTT and OPNFV Merge
- CNTT as an LFN Committee (Similar to CVC and EUAG)
- Time Line 20 Min
- William DIEGO (Orange) Discussion on why the accelerated schedule to present to LFN board in august.
- Heather Kirksey explained two primary reasons:
- 1) Board is expecting progress
- 2) Funding for 2021 is beginning and budgeting for CNTT work must be considered for the process.
- William DIEGO (Orange) et. el Asked for clarification on Budget issues, such as Costs of options, etc.
- Action Item: Scot Steele and Jim Baker to work up costing to the best of their ability to provide to work stream.
- Scot Steele Re-iterated that the proposals for 19 Aug will only provide 3 top level slides
- Orange is concerned that their participation is being constrained as they are on holiday
- William DIEGO (Orange) Also asked why a vote as proposed would be needed. Scot Steele explained that the purpose of the vote is to gain understanding of the community preference prior to the LFN board meeting as data. William DIEGO (Orange) expressed the Orange feels that a vote is not needed as things are working well now and until we have a more clearly defined proposals. Beth Cohen and Trevor Cooper expressed support. Heather Kirksey expressed it isnt binding, that it could be data that could be used by the board who will make the final decision.