Materials:

• Definition of Consensus

• Structure of Consensus Building in Communities

• 5 steps making community decisions without consensus

• Disagree and Commit Definition

• Topic: CNTT/OPNFV FMO - Date: Jul 28, 2020 08:55 Pacific Time (US and Canada) Meeting Recording: https://zoom.us/rec/share/2JN3Eui3-lhJbNLc733vfLd9Wbj4eaa8hyNP_PILyxsDqn4ev9mpramGlMufpYeJ

Topics/Notes:

• Anti-Trust Policies:

  • LFN Anti-Trust Policy Notice

  • GSMA Anti-Trust Policy Notice.

• Status on proposals 10 min

  • CNTT as a formal LFN project

    • In flight, @Walter.kozlowski @Scott Steinbrueck  and @Beth Cohen Working on proposal

  • CNTT and OPNFV Merge

    • In flight,@Al Morton @Jim Baker @Qiao Fu @Ildiko@Georg Kunz @Sridhar Raoworking on proposal

    • @Al Morton requests that CNTT participate in the development, @Scot Steele will discuss on Thursday's CNTT Governance call, @Former user (Deleted) seconded the ask and questioned why CNTT had not provided support yet.  @Scot Steele posited that CNTT may not have recognized that call to action, and commiited to work to that end.

    • @Al Morton indicated that someone take on the Mgmt of this proposal. @Scot Steele will work on that.

    • @Former user (Deleted) commented that we have not had much progress, @Heather Kirksey (Deactivated) concurred, and commented that we've moved to smaller groups to work on proposals.

  • CNTT as an LFN Committee (Similar to CVC and EUAG)

    • @Beth Cohen AND @Nick Chase wiIll develop starting 7/29.

• Time Line 20 Min

  • @William DIEGO (Orange) Discussion on why the accelerated schedule to present to LFN board in august.

  • @Heather Kirksey (Deactivated) explained two primary reasons:

    • 1) Board is expecting progress

    • 2) Funding for 2021 is beginning and budgeting for CNTT work must be considered for the process.

  • @William DIEGO (Orange) et. el Asked for clarification on Budget issues, such as Costs of options, etc.

    • Action Item: @Scot Steele and @Jim Baker to work up costing to the best of their ability to provide to work stream.

  • @Scot Steele Re-iterated that the proposals for 19 Aug will only provide 3 top level slides

  • Orange is concerned that their participation is being constrained as they are on holiday

  • @William DIEGO (Orange) Also asked why a vote as proposed would be needed. @Scot Steele explained that the purpose of the vote is to gain understanding of the community preference prior to the LFN board meeting as data. @William DIEGO (Orange) expressed the Orange feels that a vote is not needed as things are working well now and until we have a more clearly defined proposals. @Beth Cohen and @Trevor Cooper expressed support. @Heather Kirksey (Deactivated) expressed it isnt binding, that it could be data that could be used by the board who will make the final decision. 

  • Action Item: @Scot Steele to publish infomation regarding the meetings for FMO and proposal development.