Agenda and Meeting Minutes 17Aug2021
Attendees:
@Bob Monkman (Deactivated)ย (Intel)
@kumarcvย (Verizon)
@Former user (Deleted)(Intel)
@Igor D.C.(Intel)
@Timo Perala (Nokia)
17Aug Agenda is:
Anti-Trustย
Opens?ย
Technical Charter Review- Bob Monkman received questions from Timo Perala- to be addressed
-Review Technical Charter here:ย https://docs.google.com/document/d/1t4mVANeIN2cmyYIMwdTlUAcy36MSRmxYHw-GHf7nTEc/edit
Example:ย Anuket
Example: ONAP: Section 4.4.1.4 here -ย https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Technical+Community+Document+-+Post+LFN
Seek any additional feedback changes so that we can finalize the Technical Charter
Update on LFN Repo
Update on TAC Induction
Update on Creative Brief for Logo
Open Discussion & Next Steps
CLA Discussion- Add to the Agenda for next week.ย
Future Agenda Items:
TAC Induction Preparation
DevOps CI/CD
Seed Code:
Minutes:
The Technical Charter comments and revision suggestions are now complete. So Action Item to Louis to take the latest version back into LF Legal for review of our changes and questions.ย
Discussion on GitLab Repo creation- Sharad had questions about lots of unknowns with GitLab, especially around directory structure. The question came up again as to whether we can switch to GitHUb, with which many people are more familiar.ย
This is possible, according to Louis, and EMCO would just have to pull together the CI/CD tools , but there are many familiar tools like git, gerrit, jenkins which would be fine to use.ย
Suggesting that we switch move back. Sriram, from Aarna, indicates that they have lots of experience with GitLab but open either way.
Srini commented that this integration with built -in GitLab is really useful and would prefer to stick with GitLab.ย
Action Item: Sriram has volunteered to work offline with Intel team to help stand up a GitLab repo and get familiar with GitLab.ย
Action Item: Louis and Sharad still need to work out the Group Name/Repo location.ย
Action Item: Bob to add CLA discussion to the Agenda.ย