2023-01-18 TAC Minutes
Attendees & Representation (default sort: member first name)
TAC Members and Project representatives should mark their attendance below
Non-TAC project reps do not count towards meeting quorum
X = Present | P = Proxy (Indicate in the table with @name for @name
Chairperson | Vice-Chair | Security Seat | 5G-SBP |
---|---|---|---|
@djhunt | @cl664y@att.com | @Amy Zwarico | @Muddasar Ahmed |
ONAP | OpenDaylight | Anuket | FD.io | |
---|---|---|---|---|
@cl664y@att.com | @Robert Varga | @Walter.kozlowski @Gergely Csatari @Lincoln Lavoie @Al Morton | @Dave Wallace | |
ODIM | EMCO | XGVela | L3AF | Tungsten Fabric |
@Martin Halstead | @Amar Kapadia | @Qihui Zhao | @Santhosh Fernandes | @Nick Davey |
Representing | Member | Representing | Member | |
---|---|---|---|---|
AT&T | @cl664y@att.com | Nokia | @Olaf Renner | |
China Mobile | vacant | Orange | @Cédric Ollivier | |
China Telecom | vacant | Red Hat | @Stephen Flaherty | |
Cisco | @Frank Brockners | Tech Mahindra | vacant | |
Deutsche Telekom | @Marc Fiedler | TELUS | @Sana Tariq | |
Ericsson | @Christian Olrog Atlassian | Verizon | vacant | |
vacant | Wallmart | @Santhosh Fernandes | ||
Huawei | @Huijun Yu | ZTE | @ChangJin Wang | |
IBM | @djhunt (Chair) | |||
LF Staff: @Casey Cain @LJ Illuzzi @Ranny Haiby @Sandra Jackson (Deactivated)
Community:
Agenda
Start the Recording
We will start by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.
Roll Call
Action Items Review
Agenda Bashing
General Topics
2022 TAC 5G-SBP Seat Election - Congratulations @Muddasar Ahmed
2023 Project Health Review scheduling
December GB follow-up discussions
Broadening the scope of the technology outlook - @Ranny Haiby
We may want to broaden the technology scope - Should projects inducted to the LF become a part of LFN?
Industry wide discussions we should pay attention to:
Serverless (AWS Lambda) for network functions
Identity and Ledger - could attract additional projects to LFN
Expand into natural adjacencies
Proposal to add a standing agenda item for "new technology" topics, that will be discussed and then lead to creation of write-up/recommendations
Maintain a list of tech topics, see who is interested in participating. @Ranny Haiby will create the initial list on the wiki.
Blueprint scope and goals - @Ranny Haiby , @Muddasar Ahmed
Induction process @Frank Brockners
Is the bar too high for joining LFN?
In reality we only ask for a documented governance and release process
Is it just a perception problem?
Nephio case in point - Perception was that joining the LF will require high degree of integration with existing LF projects. Concern about technical overlap with existing LFN projects.
Action items
We should review the sandbox induction checklist and make sure we are keeping the bar low enough.
Add a MAC rep and discuss how to address common misconceptions
Checkpoint on 2023 TAC Goals - @djhunt
Any Other Topics
Minutes
Health Reviews
Looking to schedule for projects that did not participate at the end of last year
Will also do for Security (@Amy Zwarico in early March) and 5G Super Blueprint
D&TF
Please submit presentation proposals no later than Jan 27, 2023
Conflicts with the O-RAN Alliance face-to-face; want to avoid such conflicts in the future.
December GB Follow-up
@Ranny Haiby provided an update on the GB topics.
@Frank Brockners We may want to broaden the technology scope - Should projects inducted to the LF become a part of LFN?
Industry wide discussions we should pay attention to:
Serverless (AWS Lambda) for network functions
Identity and Ledger - could attract additional projects to LFN
Expand into natural adjacencies - What projects do we want to invite?
Suggest we have a regular discussion about "new technologies" at the TAC meeting
Maintain a list of topics that we will discuss
Induction Process
Is the project formation process clear enough?
We should review the induction process further.
There is also a concern about technical overlap in other LFN projects
We should also add our MAC rep to discuss how to reduce misconceptions
5G-SBP
@Ranny Haiby There seems to be some confusion about what SBP is and isn't.
Provide collaboration platform for building important technology solutions related to 5G networks