2023-04-12 TAC Minutes
Attendees & Representation (default sort: member first name)
TAC Members and Project representatives should mark their attendance below
Non-TAC project reps do not count towards meeting quorum
X = Present | P = Proxy (Indicate in the table with @name for @name
Chairperson | Vice-Chair | Security Seat | 5G-SBP |
---|---|---|---|
TBA | @cl664y@att.com | @Amy Zwarico | @Muddasar Ahmed |
ONAP | OpenDaylight | Anuket | FD.io | |
---|---|---|---|---|
@N.K. Shankaranarayanan | @Robert Varga | @Walter.kozlowski @Gergely Csatari @Lincoln Lavoie @Al Morton | @Dave Wallace | |
ODIM | EMCO | XGVela | L3AF | Tungsten Fabric |
@Martin Halstead | @Amar Kapadia | @Qihui Zhao | @Santhosh Fernandes | @Nick Davey |
Representing | Member | Representing | Member | |
---|---|---|---|---|
AT&T | @cl664y@att.com | Nokia | P @Timo Perala for @Olaf Renner | |
China Mobile | vacant | Orange | @Cédric Ollivier | |
China Telecom | vacant | Red Hat | @Stephen Flaherty | |
Cisco | @Frank Brockners | Tech Mahindra | vacant | |
Deutsche Telekom | @Marc Fiedler | TELUS | @Sana Tariq | |
Ericsson | @Christian Olrog Atlassian | Verizon | vacant | |
vacant | Wallmart | @Santhosh Fernandes | ||
Huawei | @Huijun Yu | ZTE | @ChangJin Wang | |
LF Staff: @Casey Cain @Kenny Paul @Ranny Haiby @Sandra Jackson (Deactivated) @Andrew Grimberg
Community: @Girish Kumar
Agenda
Start the Recording
We will start by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.
Roll Call
Action Items Review
Agenda Bashing
General Topics
TAC Chair Election
New Project Induction
Any Other Topics
Minutes
LFN TAC Chair Election
The TAC Chair Election has been extended to the next TAC Meeting due to the Easter holiday.
New Project Induction
Current Sandbox Services
Marketing
Listing on LFN Website
Domain support for Project Maintained Website (Hugo, GitHub, Netlify)
Event showcase (Booth / Demos)
IT
RMSS (Release Management Support Service)
LFX Tooling
Email Forwarding
Domain Management
ReadTheDocs
Defect Tracking (Github Issues or component of jira.lfnetworking.org)
Wiki
support.linuxfoundation.org (Project, Community, and Member support)
Communications
Blogs
Quarterly LFN Newsletter
Program Management
PM assistance with onboarding the Project
Quarterly Health Review
Legal
Project Formation documentation
DCO and CLA System w/ integration into GitHub and LFX
Trademark Hosting
License Scanning
Ad Hoc legal support
Training
Mentorships
Induction pipeline
Community Promotions
@Casey Cain asked what would prevent us from bringing in a project at a higher tier?
@Frank Brockners The budget question needs to be decoupled from the technical. However, from a technical perspective, if they meet the requirements then there should be no restriction
Is there a cost for sandbox projects: The cost is minimal about $50/month, includes domain name and email forwarding.
LFX tooling is included in the cost.
@Frank Brockners asked if there anything else that we could provide at $0 for sandbox projects?
@Ranny Haiby suggested soft services e.g. coaching, mentoring and other soft services to assist.
@Kenny Paul The larger cost is the staffing resources to onboard.
LFX tooling needs to be added to the documentation as a benefit
2024 we will migrate away from Atlassian services, we need to consider what we'll use in its place.
@Casey Cain suggested promoting new projects to come to the TAC to receive guidance.
Find better ways to communicate the knowledge base as resource to new projects
@Dave Wallace Suggested more mature projects should be able to come in at different level (not sandbox)
Communicate that there isn't any gate keeping to reduce or eliminate overlap.
@cl664y@att.com asked how do we manage projects that are resolving the same issues and how do we support?
@cl664y@att.com we need clarity on which position we're taking, e.g. are we managing competing projects or are all welcome.
@Robert Varga suggested we should have open door policy but also provide a mechanism to foster consolidation.
@Robert Varga suggested not necessarily consolidating projects but sharing bits and pieces of projects (knowledge library). e.g. ONAP using parts of ODL.
@Casey Cain talked about refreshing the doucmentation
@Frank Brockners noted that we should explicitly note that we welcome overlaping projects
Girish Kumar of Infosys introduced himself.
@cl664y@att.com suggested we set time for the next meeting for Mr. Kumar to share why Infosys joined LFN
June D&TF is the second week of June 6th -9th
To be a project committee representative reach out to @Casey Cain