MMA Agenda and Minutes 11Aug 2020
Attendees
@Bob Monkman (Deactivated) (Intel)
@Scot Steele (AT&T)
@Beth Cohen (Verizon)
@Nick Chase (Mirantis)
@Beth Cohen (Verizon)
@Andrew McLachlan (Deactivated) (Red Hat)
Agenda Bashing
Agenda
Discuss Proposed Webinar Panel Session for 22 September for Intel Network Builders series with talking points and participants –
Topic: Incorporating Hardware based Network Interfaces into Open Source Infrastructure Reference Models
Outline: Panel discussion with representatives from across the Telecom Industry ecosystem
Nick Chase – Mirantis Moderator
Beth Cohen – Verizon
Scot Steele – AT&T
Bob Monkman – Intel
Phil Robb – Ericsson
Start with quick 5-10 minute overview of CNTT (or whatever it will be called by then) and its mission -- Nick
Questions:
How does a SDN network reference infratructure model/architecture incorporate real hardware elements?
How can this be done without sacrificing vendor neutrality?
How does this affect the vendor/operator technical relationships?
How can the CNTT framework help?
Updated discussion on captured summary accomplishment talking points/Call to action in their areas that we can amplify in marketing messages –
Review any update on Field trials. – Mirantis is building the RI1 implementation based on the specifications from RA1
ROI Discussion - Brainstorming Nick & Scot- Update
Open Discussion on continued Marketing Messaging
Outstanding ARs
@Bob Monkman (Deactivated) begin drafting questions for participant survey
@Bob Monkman (Deactivated) ask Phil Robb for rep on panel
Minutes:
1st pass summation of accomplishments/next steps polling
Accomplishments:
defined an architecture w/ clear APIs, requirements and test requirements
defined profiles for compute-intensive , network-intensive workloads , capabilities and measurements and mapped them together
Common APIs, common language about expectations and descriptions of needed solutions, makes it easier to deliver on the expected solutions
common ways to express resources and easier to track changes,; easier to code from common specification language
We have built a generic, flexible and yet concrete model that can spawn multiple Ref architetures
we have been identifying and closing gaps previously unaddressed
The Ref Model and profiles and relationships are already making it easier to write RFxs by creating standard ways of asking for and assessing solutions
For some operators, the RA is useful for operations to build a concrete architecture while RI/RC is becoming a recognized sandbox for evolving the solutions
Meanwhile, we have engaged experts from a broad cross section of the supply chain and established strong working relationships with other stakeholders on OSS projects and SDOs
Note: TIP Open COre project engaged to consider there k8s implementation to be based on RA-2
We are now evolving the models for practical real world hybrid deployments of VM/container architectures to realize the necessary co-existence of IaaS/Caas which much be managed on the same HW w/ complex multi-tenant ecosystem
CHallenges/where we need help
how to integrate SDN into cloud arch
how to automate build, deploy and operational aspects
how to exploit HW capabilities in a vendor neutral way- Need Open HW Infra Mgmt
Revisited the discussion on the nomenclature of the main workstreams Rx-1 and Rx-2 , OpenStack/VM v Containers/k8s, but since nothing is cut and dry , distinct
The real problem is that numeric distinction implies versions
RA- MS is one idea where MS= Microservices and the RA-1 could be expressed as RA-VM
Not much progress on the Costing Model due to focus on FMO
Field trials with AT&T and Mirantis still working thru preparation issues.
Next steps: Continue to flesh out questions for Baraque release statements survey and milestones needed to prepare for the Spet webinar panel.