2020-05-15 [CNTT - GSC] - FMO Discussion
- Scot Steele
- Toshi Wakayama
- Former user (Deleted)
Materials:
Attendees:
@Scot Steele
@Former user (Deleted)
@Beth Cohen (Verizon)
@Pankaj.Goyal (AT&T)
@Al Morton (AT&T)
@Toshi Wakayama (KDDI)
Topics:
Anti-Trust Policies:
Discuss/define remediation for Gaps, Issues, Scope between CNTT/OPNFV
Define the Pros and Cons of the Current Model
Open the discussion on FMO
Set recurring meeting schedule
Notes:
Discuss/define remediation for Gaps, Issues, Scope between CNTT/OPNFV
Agreed on Areas
Communications between the groups is lacking, and disruption in progress occurs because of it.
No agreed upon "RACI"
Few people are cross community, those that are are overworked
Feature/Function Stakeholder ownership is lost in Traceability Matrix
Stakeholders should help provide resources for feature/function development
Architect and engineer skills are decidedly different
No Aligned roadmaps
Action items
CNTT/OPNFV Requirements gathering processes should be the same with Stakeholders to remain identified and expected to provide resources
Need community roadmaps that are aligned, with potential long term "roadmap framework"that community roadmaps fit within.
Need to have more cross community participation without increasing number of meetings and participant workloads (Meeting analysis and effectiveness)
Identify ways to hold joint meetings to help reduce # and scope of meetings
Review how meetings are managed, with potential to have more effective ones.
Must get focused on developing Future Mode for LFN board Meeting on 6/17. Target 6/12 to complete work for board meeting.
@Scot Steele will manage work effort.
Define the Pros and Cons of the Current Model
Not discussed in detail
Will be addressed in future meetings
Open the discussion on FMO
Will be addressed in future meetings
Set recurring meeting schedule
One 30 minute and one 1hr meeting per week agreed upon. Targeting Tuesdays and Fridays.
@Jim Baker and @Scot Steele to work on schedule