/
2020-07-15 TAC Minutes

2020-07-15 TAC Minutes

Owned by Casey Cain
Last updated: Jul 17, 2020 by Qihui Zhao
2 min read

Attendees & Representation (default sort: member first name)

TAC Members and Project representatives should mark their attendance below 
Non-TAC project reps do not count towards meeting quorum

X = Present | P = Proxy  (Indicate in the table with @name for @name

Member

Representing



Member

Representing



Member

Representing



Member

Representing



Member

Representing



Member

Representing



@Abhijit K

ODL 

X

@Ed Warnicke

FD.io

X

@Prabhjot Singh Sethi

TF (incubation)



@Al Morton

OPNFV

X

@Eyal Felstaine

Amdocs



@Ranny Haiby 

Samsung

X

@Anil Guntupalli

Verizon



@Frank Brockners 

Cisco



@Timothy Verrall (Deactivated) 

Intel

X

@FREEMAN, BRIAN D

AT&T

X

@djhunt 

@zygmunt_lozinski

IBM

P

@thomas nadeau 

Red Hat



@cl664y@att.com

ONAP

X

@Lingli Deng 

China Mobile



TBD

Juniper



@ChangJin Wang

ZTE

X

@Marc Fiedler 

Deutsche Telekom

X

@Kalyankumar Asangi

Huawei

X

@Christian Olrog Atlassian

Ericsson

X

@Mike Lazar

OPX (sandbox)



@Xiaojun Xie

China Telecom



@Davide Cherubini

Vodafone



@Morgan Richomme

Orange









@David Sauvageau

Bell Canada



@Oguzhan Ceylan 

Türk Telekom









@Dhananjay Pavgi 

Tech Mahindra



@Olaf Renner

Nokia

X

TBD

VMware



LF Staff: @Casey Cain @Kenny Paul @Jim Baker @Brandon Wick @LJ Illuzzi

Others: @Qihui Zhao @Zhiqiang Yu  @Scot Steele @Qiao Fu @Xuxia Zhong @Amit Tiwari @Kalyankumar Asangi @Gergely Csatari 

Agenda

  • Start the Recording

  • Show the Antitrust Policy

  • Roll Call

  • Action Items Review

  • Agenda Bashing

  • General Topics

    • Encourage platform maturity, stability, modularity, and robustness - Discussion

    • Introduction to XGVela - @Qihui Zhao

    • CNTT future mode of operations - Options discussion @Scot Steele

  • Any Other Topics

Minutes

Discussion - Enabling platform maturity, stability, modularity, and robustness 

  • A SPC KPI exists that asked that we measure the maturity of all the LFN projects

  • @cl664y@att.com Jason/Chaker has shared the project lifecycle with the TAC that includes maturity assessments - perhaps a year ago - review and revitalize 

    • Looking to build common criteria cross-projects and have the LFN TAC make the assessment during project reviews

  • @FREEMAN, BRIAN D Should have non-ONAP folks review the SP3 approach from ONAP

  • @Ed Warnicke  Security surface areas are totally different between ONAP and FD.io by virtue of where they reside in the stack - so we need project specific objectives for these factors

  • @Ed Warnicke Believes that the Board should not be implementing KPIs for Projects, just the LFN because KPIs do no provide value to shipping a product.

  • @FREEMAN, BRIAN D KPIs cannot be shared across projects, categories might be the same, but metrics may be different

    • Ask the projects what their metrics are for those categories AND determine which ones make sense for the project

  • Next steps: Launch email discussion LFN PMs



Introduction to XGVela



Discussion - CNTT future mode of operations 

  • @Scot Steele Reviewed the status of CNTT and the shift away from a task-force to some more sustainable structure and decision making process

    • Option 1: CNTT become a LFN project

    • Option 2: CNTT as a committee of the LFN GB

    • Option 3: Merge CNTT into OPNFV

  • @Ed Warnicke Needs of an SDO are different than an open source project - eg. IP handling, ratification of standard

Action items

@Casey Cain Launch email to discuss the assessment of project maturity. Jul 17, 2020 
@Qihui Zhao upload the slides presented to these minutes Jul 16, 2020