EUAG 2020-06-16 Meeting notes

Date

Jun 16, 2020

Attendees

LF Staff: @Brandon Wick  @Jim Baker  @LJ Illuzzi  @Kenny Paul
Committee Members: @Cecilia Corbi @Javier Ger  @Ken KANISHIMA @Atul Purohit  @Gerald Kunzmann  @Fernando Oliveira @Vincent Colas @Ryan Hallahan @Lei Huang  @Saad Ullah Sheikh
Proxies:
Guests: @Scott Blandford

Agenda

• Start the Recording

• Antitrust Policy

• Agenda Bashing (Roll Call, Action Items (5 minutes)

• General Topics

  • Release G priority discussion deck @Atul Purohit

    • Step 1 : Create an XLS from requirements that we have received so far

    • Step 2 : Do a correlation activity between received requirements  and what has been proposed on release G pages in Confluence

    • Step 3 : We need to track the commitment for each requirements and mark in against the requirements in EUAG requirements priority xls

  • Is there EUAG BEYOND ONAP? @Jim Baker

    • I've had community members asking me if the advisory group advises anything other than ONAP?

    • What does it take to move beyond ONAP? 

  • AOB

Minutes

Release G priority discussion

• White paper final copy produced - final review all comments due Jun 17, 2020 noon PDT

• Publishing plans

  • LFN.org and ONAP.org websites

  • Links will be sent out once the white paper is posted - please cross-share the links to the white paper

LFN Virtual event week of Jun 22, 2020 

• will be presenting an overview of the whitepaper @ the vDTF 2020 June Virtual LFN Developer & Testing Forum Topic Proposals

July webinar

• The LFN MAC coordinates a webinar series and EUAG is proposing a 1 hr. webinar of the whitepaper later in July

CNTT 

• @Ahmed El Sawaf has agreed to provide the bridge between CNTT and EUAG

• More on this topic in the next meeting

VNF testing automation survey

• 6 responses so far - please add your ideas: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/KKF5V6Z

• Hoping to get double-digits response

Release G requirements

• Summarized in a spreadsheet for reviewing Release G Consolidated Requirements-16June2020.xlsx

• Received requirements from: Swisscom/TIM/STC/Vodafone/Orange/China Mobile/NTT Labs/Bell Canada/AT&T/Telecom Argentina

• Also need to prioritize the EUAG requirements AND represent the requirements in the ONAP TSC calls

• @Kenny Paul reminded the EUAG that the primary source of influence is allocation of resources

  • it was noted that the "what resources are you. contributing" column in the requirements summary got dropped from the spreadsheet for RelG

EUAG beyond ONAP

• EUAG was formed when several of the projects had their own advisory group, ONAP did not have one

• How can we grow the understanding of the projects and EUAG representation of each

• Too much for any person to be familiar with all of the LFN Projects - Probably need to have subgroups

• Proposal: round-robin project review- similar to TAC review, but geared to a different audience that may no know about a project.

  • How can EUAG help your community?

  • What feedback would be most valuable to your project?

Action items