Plenary: Daily Summaries
,
Topic Leader(s)
@Heather Kirksey
@Kenny Paul
@Casey Cain
@Jim Baker
@Trishan de Lanerolle
30m
This page will be used to provide a brief summary of the daily topics, provide feedback to the LFN staff, and plan for the next day.
Meeting minutes and action items should be recorded on your Topic page
Jun 7, 2021
Track w/Link | 1-2 Key Points | Challenges |
---|---|---|
Event Logistics | ||
A great presentation by @Heather Kirksey targeted for new members of the community, but also a good refresher for existing community members. | ||
| Can we agree on the testing requirements? Need to determine the scope of the interaction between other platforms. See slides for details. | |
WP: where is this headed (1-3 years, 3+years), Use cases (now and in pipeline), Interested in 1-3 year focus for use cases. Looking at short term use cases – practical next steps. Possible use case: AI/ML assisted Closed Loop Automation (for QoS, …) | What is the definition of intelligent network here? I guess it is different from 3G IN. What do you mean on unified platform? How can we agree on a common data set for testing, development and validation. |
Jun 8, 2021
Project | Track w/Link | 1-2 Key Points | Challenges |
---|---|---|---|
ONAP 9 sessions today ! |
| ||
| |||
| Current path is to deploy Magma CNF. Is there any value to deploy Magma VNF? | ||
ONAP: Next Generation Security and Logging Architecture, Design and Roadmap |
| ||
ONAP: CDS and Terraform for Multi-Domain Orchestration and Interconnection of Cloud and Edge |
| ||
| |||
Anuket 6 sessions today | Anuket: Cloud-Native Full Stack Conformance Validation Framework |
| Apparent overlap with existing Anuket tools (Functest), Next steps discussed include investigation of applicability in RC2 work. |
Antket TSC Meeting |
| Joint meeting with EUAG was slightly premature: most EUAG members need to do homework on Anuket to work topics like Anuket-Assured and Recruiting a with some background. | |
Anuket leftover (actions) from the Merger |
| more to do... | |
Anuket: Anuket assured hyperscalers or hyperscaler assured Anuket? |
| "We believe that there is not enough business in the telecom workloads for the hyperscalers to support these "difficult" workloads." | |
Anuket: Cloud-Native (operations on) Openstack |
| Next steps: mapping OS to K8s funtions, and how this would work with installers like AIRSHIP. | |
OpenDaylight | @Venkatrangan Govindarajan | ||
@Robert Varga | |||
@Guillaume Lambert @Navid Ghazisaidi @Luis Gomez Palacios | |||
@Anil Shashikumar Belur @Luis Gomez Palacios @Manoj Chokka @Venkatrangan Govindarajan | |||
@Robert Varga |
Jun 9, 2021
Project | Topic | 1-2 Key Points | Challenges / Requests |
---|---|---|---|
OpenDaylight |
| Currently migrating relevant data from old sources to a single source of truth and improving the overall documentation. | |
Tungsten Fabric | @Nick Davey | ||
| |||
| No questions from the few non-community members that joined. | ||
Anuket 5 sessions today | Anuket: Cloud Infrastructure Security |
| Security risks of Open Source SW listed, and there are new requirements in the RM, but not yet fully addressed in development or testing (use of trivy and linters now).
|
Anuket: Multi/Hybrid Cloud |
| For Public clouds:
| |
Anuket: OpenStack Release Selection |
| Many factors in this decision. | |
Anuket: Containerizing Traffic and Load Generators for K8S Performance Testing - Opportunities and Challenges |
| Need Open Source Traffic Generators with sufficient capabilities and ability to test at the top-end of HW/Infrastructure, for use in conformance and assurance. | |
Anuket: Profiles and Flavors (and proposal for Extensions) |
| ||
ONAP | 2021-06-09 - ONAP: SO Custom Workflow Onboarding and Orchestration |
| |
2021-06-09 - ONAP: Network Management Community Coordination |
| Parallel work going on in standards, research and open source bodies. Opportunities to learn from each other. Proposal for a more in-depth cross-organization technical session on closed loops (Action Item for Magnus) Request ONAP E2E Network Slicing use-case team to review and analyze the impact of 3GPP SA5 Rel 17 (TS 28.541 NRM) new updates introduced for ServiceProfile and SliceProfile and see if they can be used in ONAP future release. | |
•Merging the paths of the Native Helm and ETSI flows | Call to CNF vendor to work with the ONAP Community to onboard, instantiate and orchestrate their CNF. Call for developers to implement in Jakarta new features:
| ||
|
Challenges: Istanbul scope is relatively big - need active community support to close on the targetted items. | ||
| Projects have NEW Global Requirements in Istanbul (vulnerable package upgrades & CII badging improvement) Outlined SECCOM and PTL responsibilities for each of the Istanbul Global Requirements. Note that Python upgrade support is available. Future releases will be affected by the Istanbul design and architecture work to migrate logging, access and identity management to service mesh and open standards. | ||
2021-06-09 - ONAP: Usecases supported by Intent-based Networks (E2E Slicing & CCVPN) |
|
Jun 10, 2021
Project | Topic | 1-2 Key Points | Challenges |
---|---|---|---|
Tungsten Fabric |
| ||
| |||
| |||
ONAP 9 Sessions today! | 2021-06-10 - ONAP TSC Task Force: Cloud Native (Ask Us Anything) | Q&A Session
| We need to have more real-life CNFs onboarded both by vendors and operators, so they can provide feedback to the CNF Taskforce about the usability of the CNF orchestration. |
2021-06-10 - ONAP: OOF SON use case roadmap and RAN considerations |
| Concerns expressed a couple of times regarding licensing issues which prevent members of the ONAP community from actually seeing the ORAN specs that we are supposed to be coding for. | |
2021-06-10 - ONAP: Network Slicing using ONAP and a commercial 5G Core |
| ||
| Need to certify officially upgrade from one release to another one | ||
| Call for ONAP Integration PTL ONAP in 2025 - Where will we be? | ||
| |||
We heard short presentations of four requirements:
And the slide deck contains also one pager of SECCOM Istanbul requirements All Istanbul Requirements can be found at: Istanbul Release Requirements | |||
Decoupled CCSDK-Based Controller Architecture:
| POC finding: Porting Northbound ITFs is harder, especially CRUD (create, read, update, and delete) operations) | ||
| |||
XGVela | Technical deep dive into XGVela strategy for:
| ||
Anuket |
| It is difficult to collaborate with O-RAN | |
Anuket | Backlog for Lakese we built
| ||
Anuket | 2021-06-10 - Anuket: Working towards a consolidated documentation |
|